The post about the biracial progressive white supremacist, caused me to make the connection to White DNA as a weapon, especially AnalogMan’s pointing out that if Asians bred White kids, they would use them as janissaries to conquer us.
To us, our DNA is not a weapon; our DNA is what we are; a source of joy and of our life itself. But to others, we are a weapon, and that’s why they want to mix us out of existence. YKW want to be the only white people on earth, ruling over the global coffee colored plantation. All in the name of “safety from those genocidal monsters and embryonic Nazis.”
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University, makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as Gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.
This meme in simpler form has long been the mantra of the Multiculters, White people were only good at committing genocide. All antis say this; or better, they parrot it, with my apologies to Matt Parrott.
The underlying idea is that Whites are weaponized DNA, and bringing down our numbers and demographic and geographical dominance is a matter of curbing a population of dangerous animals. Of course YKW are also weaponized DNA; their fertility will continue to be encouraged. It’s all about them.
So let’s look at it with their lens; let’s reverse engineer the YKW genocidal attack on us. What are we to do? Some people fantasize about cinematic retaliation using weapons of death.
I say we think outside the box, and view reproductive technologies as “life weapons.” After all, how is Mexico conquering the USA, and Muslims conquering Europe? With the wombs of Mexican and Muslim women. Life weapons! There’s a graphic out there, which I could not find, showing a veiled pregnant Muslim woman with a lighted fuse on her belly.
This technology does not need to be used in only one place. We should use it in many places at once, in case in some countries they crack down on the breeding labs. Russia, where they want a higher White birthrate and authorities can be greased, would be a good place. Russians would probably use this tech as well. Over there the average Russian on the street, as well as the educated classes, believe in eugenics and in White survival. Russia is an excellent candidate for a PLE. It’s been done before. A lot of German farmers settled Russia a few centuries ago, on the Volga River, and brought great benefits to their adopted Rodina. We could bring ancient Anglo-Saxon values to the Slavs — openness, honesty, less corruption. The Anglo-Saxon Slav combination has worked very well for my family.
There are Whites who have many children as a weapon, or at least I remember such a thing from a Jerry Springer show in the 1990’s. The problem is those kids were not given high investment upbringings.
We need to combine high fertility with a degree of economic communalism and communal living, and very high investment parenting. Our version of Tiger Mom.
The worst thing about this post is that it is a bit of techno-fantasizing. I realize that. I call on readers to research reproductive technologies and report back to here in the comments. I found something on Wikipedia
At that link, you might notice this tidbit:
Israel’s National Health Insurance, which is mandatory for all Israeli citizens, covers nearly all fertility treatments. In-Vitro-Fertilization costs are fully subsidized up to the birth of two children for all Israeli women, including single women and lesbian couples. Embryo transfers for purposes of gestational surrogacy are also covered.
Israel is the only country that provides this for free for all women.
So if some scientist out there wanted to start a fertility clinic in a lower regulation environment such as Russia, I’m guessing that Russia would experience a new fertility tourism boom to replace the child adoption boom.
Now there’s nothing more personal than children, and I do not believe I’m in a position, in this forum or any other, to criticize anyone’s most intimate choices, but some of the quotes attributed to Miss Peterson this week, frankly, made me squirm.
She told the Washington Post News Service, quote, “I’m Swedish-Norwegian and I really wanted to have a gene pool that was similar to my own. I wanted a baby that looked like me and wanted to share my heritage with my baby. Now I have a beautiful Viking baby, which is what I wanted. I was hoping to give her a full sibling.”
I don’t know if that kind of reasoning is racist, but it is certainly preoccupied with genetics and bloodlines. To be blunt, it makes me feel creepy. Who’s to say that a child she could adopt from Guatemala or a baby conceived with a father who’s Irish or Navajo can’t share Julie Peterson’s interest in Scandinavian heritage? Does she really want children or just sophisticated dolls who will look and act just like her? And what happens when her beautiful little Viking becomes a real kid and decides that she likes hip-hop, Bollywood movies or dyes her hair purple?
I understand that such strong physical preferences – I won’t call them prejudices – are a part of romantic attraction and what people may seek in a partner. But it doesn’t sound as if Julie Peterson wants a partner, just a few ccs from an unseen donor. And I wonder if someone with such exacting criteria in the bloodlines and mere physical appearance of a child really knows who and what children are and what really makes us love them.
Are you convinced yet? Scott Simon is screaming at you, “Don’t you dare engage in racist reproduction! You make me feel creepy!”
Nordic babies make Scott Simon feel creepy indeed. But free assisted reproduction for Israeli women is just fine and dandy, eh Scott?
Life weapons are real, and it is legal for us to develop and acquire them. Maybe we shouldn’t call them “life weapons,” we should discuss it in terms of love and families. But if the YKW are not making it clear enough — reproduction and White DNA is a weapon; they want the monopoly; they want to be the only white people on the planet.
There is probably better technology for breeding than is publicly known. The highest goal would be to be able to propagate many perfect embryos (no genetic defects, high IQ, beautiful) at a low cost. A woman would only have to give one egg donation and infinite eggs could be propagated from that.
It is probably also possible to create a machine or a mass of living tissue that can do pregnancy; however, what would a baby be like that wasn’t inside a woman’s body? Would it lose anything? If babies could be gestated normally in machines or tissue masses, we could produce many more at a time at a lower cost.
The late Khalid Mohammed, a Farrakhan follower, called White women “an arms factory, and every 9 months, more reinforcements come in.” I couldn’t find the youtube video or the quote, but I remember it clearly.
Now I understand why Never Let Me Go is my favorite movie. This movie really ties it all together. The characters, who are all White, have to die in their late 20’s or early 30’s, by donating their organs. They were cloned and raised with this purpose. They live most of their lives without thinking about it, but when it comes time to actually start undergoing donations, they want deferrals — even a few more years to live. But, as Kathy H., who always looks on the verge of tears but never actually cries, says with a hint of a quivering lip but an Anglo-Saxon stoicism:
“There are no deferrals Tommy.”
There are lines in the movie where both the cloned kids and the non-clones say, “You are filling a very important role in society. People will never agree to go back to the days of lung cancer and motor neuron disease.”
In other words, you have to die for the great good of society.
This is the logic of the multiculters too. White people are dangerous, weaponized DNA, and therefore we have to be culled for everyone’s (YKW’s) safety. But of course, this is shit logic. We are not uniquely violent; we are only better at it, just like we are good at surgery and aviation. We are not uniquely culpable; we are not dangerous animals; we don’t deserve to be treated like timber wolves in beef ranching country.