Washington Post: Geneticists find that Africans are a different species

Black Africans are a different species after all.

The article doesn’t come out and say it, but it’s the obvious conclusion.

The human family tree just got another — mysterious — branch, an African “sister species” to the heavy-browed Neanderthals that once roamed Europe.

While no fossilized bones have been found from these enigmatic people, they did leave a calling card in present-day Africans: snippets of foreign DNA.

There’s only one way that genetic material could have made it into modern human populations.

“Geneticists like euphemisms, but we’re talking about sex,” said Joshua Akey of the University of Washington in Seattle, whose lab identified the mystery DNA in three groups of modern Africans.

These genetic leftovers do not resemble DNA from any modern-day humans. The foreign DNA also does not resemble Neanderthal DNA, which shows up in the DNA of some modern-day Europeans, Akey said. That means the newly identified DNA came from an unknown group.

“We’re calling this a Neanderthal sibling species in Africa,” Akey said. He added that the interbreeding probably occurred 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, long after some modern humans had walked out of Africa to colonize Asia and Europe, and around the same time Neanderthals were waning in Europe.

In other words, Africans interbred with non-homo sapiens rather than maintaining reproductive isolation and evolving into a new species. The prehistorical Africans cursed themeselves, effectively reversing evolution on themselves, and in the modern day, race mixing with Africans by non-Africans is reversing evolution on one’s own family line. It is a crime against one’s ancestors.


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Washington Post: Geneticists find that Africans are a different species

  1. Snake says:

    A fascinating find surely to cripple the “weez all beee eekwull cuz weeez all from Afrikka” line. Without delving into the humour aspect of this, I wonder what the newly discovered ape looked like?

  2. feminizedwesternmale says:

    Something many of us long expected. I bet the “Chimp Out” guys are going crazy over this. Also unsurprised by the dogmatic line that the more developed races are “out of Africa.”

  3. Ryu says:

    Biologists recognize race. You just have to know how to read between the lines. They dress it up as subspecies, ethnicity or breed. The definition of species depends upon who you ask and there is no good answer. Alot of people say it’s sexual isolation; no interbreeding. But with that definition, there are no dog breeds.

  4. Jackson says:

    Also I think the SE Asians, maybe the Maylays, have a 3rd proto-human that they interbred with a few tens of thosands of years ago. The Northern Asians, like the Chinese have Neanderthal genetic markers, like Europeans. It’s kinda funny if that somehow has to do with the smarter human variations, as it’s been a slang term for ‘retarded’ forever. There was an article on it at AltRight a year ago, I think Spencer wrote it.

  5. Outlier says:

    The Family

    I was just watching the opening ceremonies of the London Olympics ….. they had a piece called “The Family” where a WHITE-BLOND women pulls up in front of her house in a red and white Austin Mini and her BLACK son gets out and they go into the house where she greeted by her BLACK husband and their BLACK daughters.

    Then, they followed up by a performance by a saggy arse gangsta monkey rapper.

    WTF has the UK become ???

    So, Britain fought WW2 for this ?

  6. Africans were getting their muh dik on with green monkeys as recently as… what time is it?

    It’s called cospeciation folks, and MW is right: africans screwed themselves and de-evolved as a result.

  7. Darwin considered blacks to be so different from whites it wouldn’t be outrageous to class them as two distinct species:

    “But since he attained to the rank of manhood, he has diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more appropriately called sub-species. Some of these, for instance the Negro and European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered by him as good and true species” – The Descent of Man, Volume 2

    I imagine that what he means by “further information” is the numerous other ethnic groups who are in between the capacities of white and black.

    It’s good that science shows that the races are immutably different, but I’m skeptical about whether it will do much to change anyone’s mind. Racial differences have always been obvious to everyone who didn’t willingly blind themselves to them.

    • Ryu says:

      The HBDers know all about this stuff. It is there field of excellence. But it does not make them WNs. Often, I find that they take pains to show how tolerant of these differences they are. It’s like Hitler said – for the many, aim for the heart. For the few, aim for the head.

  8. Columnist says:

    The Africans themselves claim extraterrestial ancestry. Seriously. But recently, I spread a very powerful meme:”Does the Dajjal control the oil in the Middle-East?”

  9. Tabu LaRaza says:

    what time is it?

    Both later and earlier than you think, I think.



  11. George says:

    Wile I do agree that Africans are likely there own species this does not eliminate them from a right to Human Dignity

  12. Godfrey says:

    Does it not fit with the book of Enoch’s account? See LXXXV-XC. Second Dream-Vision of Enoch: the History of the World to the Founding of the Messianic Kingdom and LXXXVI. The Fall of the Angels and the Demoralization of Mankind.

  13. DaniAL 2:43 came to mind,… “And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, THEY shall mingle themselves WITH THE SEED OF MEN: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.”

  14. q bert says:

    You are right, they do that all on their own.

  15. klepp0906 says:

    Anyone with common sense can see that. We didn’t need a scientist to tell us lol.

    Wolfs and dogs can mate and have less in the way of physical and behavioral differences than humans and Africans yet we don’t consider them the same species do we?

  16. Bodi says:

    This explains why blacks don’t fit socially, intellectually or emotionally into a predominantly white society with a sprinkling of Asians, a society in which they would fare far worse. It also explains the underlying unspoken truth about our social policy of affirmative action, a concept that recognizes the difference of blacks where the white measure of performance is unfair and should not apply to them. Blacks lack conscience, values of any sort that are compatible with civilized society in the Asian and western sense, guilt, empathy and other qualities in western and Asian cultures. Incarceration rates further confirm this. Blacks don’t learn the way whites and Asians do. They know it all and it’s everyone’s else fault for their despair. Anything that displeases them is the result of racism. This quagmire can be solved by overcoming our society’s denial based on political correctness and recognize what life experience and science overwhelmingly supports—the fact that blacks are a different species. Would it be fair to have the same social, intellectual and emotional expectations as whites and Asians for gorillas and chimps?

    • Nic says:

      Well explained Bodi

    • Bollweevil says:

      Thank you, Bodi. Also I have for some time now – perhaps for the past 2-3 years or so – begun to feel that the Negro is so lacking in human empathy, not to say that he is grossly deficient in IQ (while there may be some Negroes who are more clever than some non-Negroes [“whites”, writ large], there are no clever Negroes who come even close to the IQ level of the clever “white”… the discussion is roughly about Negroes, not about Mulattoes), that this surely renders him a separate species (I have taken to calling him – instead of Homo Sapiens – Homo Erectus Negris, or a Negroid variant of an earlier-stage humanoid). I am further convinced that politicians wish to suppress/downplay the difference in order to prevent “white”-on-Negro genocide, and while I deplore the suppression of truth, I agree that we should not in any way encourage “whites” to retaliate against the Negro. 99.99% of the Negro’s whining about racism is, I am convinced, but resentment over having realized that he is grossly inferior to Homo Sapiens, in just about every field of endeavor out there, save sports (though he is not the “king” of all sports branches) and music-making / dancing. I positively loathe Racial Political Correctness and its Social Promotion of the Negro (such as so-called Affirmative Action, which has already morphed into something akin to a Harrison-Bergeronization of society, or a deliberate dumbing down of the job qualifications in order to make the Negro applicant / employee appear less dumb). That said (i.e,, acknowledging that genocide is not the solution), I nonetheless feel that, in sports, Negroes should be punished severely for their wantonly cruel insensitivity (lack of human empathy) toward a fellow player, be it a “white” or another Negro (picture a ‘cleats-first’ contact about to occur… where the “white” would ‘retract his claws’ [turn his foot/leg, so as to avoid injuring the other party], the Negro barrels onward, resulting in grievous – and eminently avoidable, with a modicum of HUMAN compassion!!! – bodily harm).

    • ron says:

      This is what science has always said, but our universities have been hi-jacked. Tis is the reason for so much misinformation and just pure propaganda. Our educational institutions have to be taken back plain and simple.

  17. hitecron says:

    Is time to expose politically correct for what it is, socialism. The lefties want us to believe in fairy tales, and degrade our country. They cannot stand White Christian America for whatever reasons, and are willing to cut off their noses to spite their faces!

  18. dfuf9u7 says:

    It’s a social pitfall to be sure. You bring a black girl home mother isn’t greeting her with the photo album,but rushing off to get cod liver oil and quinine as her boy seems to have caught jungle fever. The babies are real cute to be sure she thinks, but like taking in a bear cub they grow up real big,destructive,lazy,stupid.

    The politics of the day keeps her quiet about it, but she’s secretly praying for you to meet a nice white girl, to grow up, not just replace spanking the monkey to spanking an actual monkey.

  19. Doc G says:

    While it is only common sense to, as the author states that “…life experience and science overwhelmingly supports—the fact that blacks are a different species,” even ignoring the non-discussed, for the same political correctness as referred to above, i.e., the naive belief that “blacks walked out of africa and became Caucasian,” BS (especially in view of older, Caucasian remains found in Eastern Europe, i.e., 5 million years older than those found in Africa.
    Regarding the “blacks don’t fit socially, intellectually or emotionally into a predominantly white society,” is ignored by the media but evident to most Americans for some very specific reasons, in that:
    RE: Social. Blacks simply do not want to fit in in a white society (whether because of hate or others reasons they deliberately choose NOT to cooperate, i.e., speak a language (English for example that is contrary to any formal communications–the first necessity of good relations between humans and even humans and other animals such as horses, dogs, cats, etc.)
    Further, all blacks, female and male, have a decided propensity for violence that, simply put, does not allow co-existence with others (even black on black violence is a more than common occurrence everywhere they exist–especially Africa).
    RE: Intellectual. The African Blacks IQ is 45IQ on average (the reason So. Africa is in such DEEP trouble) the American Black IQ is said to be 85IQ but it is likely that, again for reasons of political correctness, that is a likely exaggeration. This makes it nearly impossible to educate or train blacks out of violence, rampant drug addiction and the adoption of social correctness such as cooperation between different races dictate.
    RE: Emotional issues. Caucasians, Asians, etc. have over the past several thousand years come to understand that direct martial conflict, i.e., war, is not generally good for either side of any such activity and have developed ways to deal, most often peacefully, with conflict by negotiation or any of dozens of other methods for conflict resolution, whereas for blacks, in ANY country you choose to observe, appear to have only one answer to conflict, i.e., violence. The meaning of this obvious observation is the lack of any emotional substitute for anger. Whites use empathy, love, or other higher-order cognitive functioning (that’s the option every Caucasian understands as “thinking your way out of a problem” behavior that blacks appear not to understand or, if they possess that faculty, fail to use).
    To conclude, therefore: a.) Blacks tend to hate whites and tend to blame whites for any problem they think they have, b.) Blacks have little or no frustration-tolerance, as we clearly saw with Barry Soetoro for 8 miserable years, and because of poor cognitive functioning tend NOT to use the same coping skills as whites, i.e., talk, mutual regard, etc., to resolve their problems, and c.) The knee-jerk use of violence as a first choice does not incline other races, or species, to cooperate with them.
    What this means in terms of “inter-racial relations,” as has been tried and re-tried for over 50 years is that there is no middle ground for peace, no mutually agreed upon an area where both caucasians and blacks can agree to cooperate, i.e., violence for it’s own sake is not acceptable to us and trying to resolve issues with talk and mutual agreement does not make sense to blacks. Further, there is no way to resolve these issues, save complete capitulation whites (which has been nothing but disastrous, at least for whites) and the only recent historical resolution for a similar situation was Spain 1492 AD and their complete expulsion of the Moore’s, i.e., Black No. African Muslims by force by the reining monarchs, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella.

  20. joemomma says:

    We’re drowning in a tidal wave of political correctness in this country. Every movie and TV show I’ve seen lately has (1) a negro and caucasian couple, and (2) a gay couple. The new “Star Trek” Discovery show kills two birds with one stone–it’s a gay interracial male couple! As someone noted above, the goal is to brainwash people into thinking it’s okay to mate with blacks and that it’s perfectly normal for men to hump other men. (Well, it is normal in that a tiny percentage of any given population will be abnormal….) Unfortunately, most people are gullible and tend to believe what they hear, instead of questioning it more often.

  21. David says:

    That explains alot. I’m against crossbreeding with the African populi. Now I’ve got solid evidence to argue my point with these octoroons.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s