Great debate! The White Rabbit debating method works!
The anti-white scum tried to claim that we can’t define who is White. Fredrik said that when anti-whites attack Whites, they are able to define who is White! That’s an outstanding retort that I first read at Majority Rights — who is White? Well, who is not eligible for affirmative action! Harvard College even distinguishes Whites from Jews!
Robot Sam comments:
Privot, the ‘anti-racist’ white hating psychotic that he is (probably a world class cock polisher to boot) wants to lay down the rules and create a frame so that he wins before the debate has even begun. He says that whites have some kind of nebulous moral responsibility to minorities originating from some unknown rule book for being minorities, and says racism is only an expression of power. Wouldn’t that be called classism or powerism then? Another stuttering little wimp who hates white people because he is a weakling and most likely a homosexual.
The truth is this. Since the advent of air travel, no minority has been required to stay in a racist white country, any hardship they experience is not our concern, nor is their welfare or ‘intrinsic worth’ whatever that is. It is now the time where they all need to leave, because groups are forming under the radar and on one central message; anti-racism is code for anti-white, and if peak oil doesn’t stop this, peak anger will.
I will continue listening to the debate, but one this is very important to listen for is that Fredrik is using the same arguments and terminology as the rest of us, and which are exactly right, direct and very clear and provable. This is wonderful. One unified message with repetition is what we need!