Scandinavian White Rabbit Fredrik debates anti-white paycheck liberal

Great debate! The White Rabbit debating method works!

The anti-white scum tried to claim that we can’t define who is White. Fredrik said that when anti-whites attack Whites, they are able to define who is White! That’s an outstanding retort that I first read at Majority Rights — who is White? Well, who is not eligible for affirmative action! Harvard College even distinguishes Whites from Jews!

Robot Sam comments:

Privot, the ‘anti-racist’ white hating psychotic that he is (probably a world class cock polisher to boot) wants to lay down the rules and create a frame so that he wins before the debate has even begun. He says that whites have some kind of nebulous moral responsibility to minorities originating from some unknown rule book for being minorities, and says racism is only an expression of power. Wouldn’t that be called classism or powerism then? Another stuttering little wimp who hates white people because he is a weakling and most likely a homosexual.

The truth is this. Since the advent of air travel, no minority has been required to stay in a racist white country, any hardship they experience is not our concern, nor is their welfare or ‘intrinsic worth’ whatever that is. It is now the time where they all need to leave, because groups are forming under the radar and on one central message; anti-racism is code for anti-white, and if peak oil doesn’t stop this, peak anger will.

I will continue listening to the debate, but one this is very important to listen for is that Fredrik is using the same arguments and terminology as the rest of us, and which are exactly right, direct and very clear and provable. This is wonderful. One unified message with repetition is what we need!

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Scandinavian White Rabbit Fredrik debates anti-white paycheck liberal

  1. When the West decided that S. Africa was for Africans it did not ask “who is really Black?” and require DNA test for all. When Mexican persecute South Americans that enter though their country’s southern borders, they don’t know exactly who is “Mexican” and who is not (which I can’t even get my head around).

    This racial purity question only comes up when dealing with White Europeans and it is just one more argument to justify White genocide.

  2. Robot Sam says:

    Privot, the ‘anti-racist’ white hating psychotic that he is (probably a world class cock polisher to boot) wants to lay down the rules and create a frame so that he wins before the debate has even begun. He says that whites have some kind of nebulous moral responsibility to minorities originating from some unknown rule book for being minorities, and says racism is only an expression of power. Wouldn’t that be called classism or powerism then? Another stuttering little wimp who hates white people because he is a weakling and most likely a homosexual.

    The truth is this. Since the advent of air travel, no minority has been required to stay in a racist white country, any hardship they experience is not our concern, nor is their welfare or ‘intrinsic worth’ whatever that is. It is now the time where they all need to leave, because groups are forming under the radar and on one central message; anti-racism is code for anti-white, and if peak oil doesn’t stop this, peak anger will.

    I will continue listening to the debate, but one this is very important to listen for is that Fredrik is using the same arguments and terminology as the rest of us, and which are exactly right, direct and very clear and provable. This is wonderful. One unified message with repetition is what we need!

  3. When I have more time, I am going to listen to the whole broadcast, but it was obvious that that weasel, Michael Privot was caught off guard and totally flustered by Fredrik’s BUGS attack. He was totally on the defensive and had to work extra hard to dodge and weave and tiptoe away from the topic of White genocide; he even lied and tried to say there were Japanese anti-racists trying to open Japan to immigration of non-Japanese, but Fredrik refused to be diverted.

    When Privot tried to imply that there was no such thing as the White race, he had no real answer for Fredrik’s retort that when it was time to assign a scapegoat for all the problems of the world, anti-racists had no problem identifying the White race.

    Bravo, Fredrik!

    • RobRoySimmons says:

      If you use their term you are on the defensive by leaving them the perception of moral superiority. They are anti-whites

  4. a boy and his dog says:

    Anyone know what happened to Hipster Racist’s blog? It went private suddenly…. I appreciated his insights.

  5. trouble says:

    BUGS works

  6. YOUR LOCAL FRIENDLY NEIGHBOURHOOD MOISHE says:

    PRIVOT COMES ACROSS AS A TYPICAL ‘BERNARD LEVY JEW PHILOSOPHER’ ANTI-RACIST FRENCH JEW – THESE PRICKS MAKE ME SICK – THEY HAVE HAD ENOUGH AIR-TIME VOICING THEIR TALMUDIC INSPIRED HATRED OF THE WHITE RACE – ‘PRIVOT’ THE FRENCH JEW SHOULD BE PARTNERED WITH OUR ANTI-WACIST FRIEND ‘JOHN SMITH’ THE CLOWN AND GIVE EACH OTHER MEAT IN THE SEAT AND SCHLEPPING EACHOTHER:))

  7. Race Traitor advocates have sought examples of race treason by whites in American history. One historical figure consistently valorized by Race Traitor (a publication favorable to the tenets of whiteness studies) is John Brown , a Northern abolitionist of European descent who battled slavery in western territories of the United States and led a failed but dramatic raid to free slaves and create an armed anti-slavery force at Harpers Ferry , West Virginia .

  8. Thanatos says:

    I listened to the whole thing in one sitting.

    Fredrik destroyed this chosen Frenchy’s arguments. I would have liked to have seen him ask how many African countries are currently the target of “anti-racist” agitation demanding an influx of white immigration.

    He also seems to have a weak spot where it comes to African and Arab racism, where he speaks of the brutal necessities of life circumscribing the “luxury” of anti-racism. I predict that we could play a question like “How do you expect importing racists into white countries from Africa and the Araby to lead to less racism in white countries?” to great effect here.

    On the rest of his babble,the typical leftist arguments which now appear as homogenized throughout the Western world as they would like for our various races to be,are now looking very shopworn indeed. They are now attempting to just run out the clock until we pass the demographic point of no return. With the ever-increasing sophistication of the white nativist argument against so-called “anti-racism”,we may have a shot of exposing and punishing these traitors before it is too late.

    Much to my chagrin, I find that many of the ones who think “whites should just die” is a good policy initiative happen to be of the chosen race. It pains me when tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracies theories turn out to be even partially right, but on this, they are right and I admit it.

    Orthodox Jews, I think, may have some common ground with us and even relate to our arguments personally (not saying you should trust them,however). Leftist Jews,on the other hand, are completely batshit insane and,at this point I would say, homicidally cheerleading the extinction of the white race. Probably because they know they will never be a part of it.

    • Thanatos says:

      “He also seems to have a weak spot where it comes to African and Arab racism, where he speaks of the brutal necessities of life circumscribing the “luxury” of anti-racism.”

      Frenchy has this weakness, not Fredrik, who of course would probably not argue that Arab and African racism against whites in a multicultural society is acceptable. Then again, Fredrik would also not believe a multicultural society is acceptable,and I would agree with him.

  9. Chief Justice Earl Warren: It falls on the question of equal protection, maybe your — your section which allows anyone with one-sixteenth or less of Indian blood to — to intermarry with the — with whites would have some significance, would it not where — where that this one says, anyone who has got a colored blood in them cannot marry with the white.

  10. Diana Blaza says:

    http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGkrwv1OVR2xQAsgNhxrF_?p=saudi+arabia+population+growth&fr=ush-smbizc&origin=smallbusiness.yahoo.com&pqstr=saudi+arabia+population

    If you check out this graph of the population of Saudi Arabia, you will see that it has been going up in the past years and will continue to do so. One of Privot’s points was that these other populations weren’t increasing. That is bs.

  11. Diana Blaza says:

    Privot wants everyone to be able to move around and settle wherever they want. How many non-white countries are open to mass immigration?

  12. Diana Blaza says:

    And now that I think back on it, he made some comment to the effect that it was the civilization that needed to be preserved not the race. And then he said there would be white people around in a hundred years but possibly not in a thousand, and what’s the difference anyway? And then he said something about we had to protect the minorities from the evil white racists by integrating them into white neighborhoods. So that makes a lot of sense. But, of course, he wasn’t for forced integration. Where are my emoticons when I need them?

  13. Gasse-Geir says:

    I wish the antiwhite guy didn’t have to talk 90% of the time. Inconsiderate.

    All in all I think the prowhite fared well, but I’d wish he’d mention some of the enormous problems that immigration brings, as an addition to the genocide-of-whites angle. A key point is that some races are more civilized than others, and when you bring a million barbarians into a country the whole level of that country goes down, crime rate rises to the sky, etc.

    And what about the rights for blacks and arabs to move to Israel and intermarry with Jews? And the Jews can have a “special culture and so on” while whites cannot have anything “special”?

    Anyway: He did a pretty good job. Just wish he could have had more talking time + touched on some more topics. Like the rape epidemic in Scandinavia, f.ex.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s