Narcissism and Nihilism: How Liberals Destroy Themselves by Tobias Langdon

Original at link

This is a theme of this blog. I find liberals fascinating because they are so self destructive and self defeating. But in doing so, they create destruction and defeat among people beyond themselves. They want to be agents of destruction and defeat, and call it righteousness.

White nationalism 2.0 is rising because we are forced to deal with the negative externalities of liberalism, their pious nihilism and extreme contradictions. For example, why would feminists be in favor of Muslim immigration?

Of course it’s not the liberalis who are setting the rules; they are the enforcers of the globalist oligarchs who promise them a cargo cult of Nation Cruises and free bread and circuses.

Your own White tribe could supply you much better, liberals. Whites could organize as Whites and provide for more for ourselves and less for racial others. You want us to be exploited and enslaved more efficiently, but you would get more from us if you took a friendly and familial rather than hostile and alien approach to us. Liberals are like ordinary people, except they got bitten by Count Hymie and they want to assist in the Count’s economic vampirism.

The globalist plutocrat vampires will fail however, because they are vampires. Vampirism burns itself out quickly when it runs out of necks to suck, as liberal nihilism (mini-vampirism) creates suicidal zombies.

Tobias Langdon on July 26, 2013 — Leave a Comment
Narcissists need mirrors. This simple truth is central to an understanding of liberalism. Liberals don’t look at the world to understand it. Instead, they look for chances to feed their vanity and parade their moral purity. Earlier this year, there were riots by Muslims in the Parisian suburb of Trappes:

The Versailles state prosecutor said the trouble started on Thursday [July 18th 2013] after police stopped and carried out an identity check on a woman in a niqab, or full-face veil. The prosecutor said the woman’s husband had assaulted one of the officers and tried to strangle him so was immediately taken into custody at the police station. Muslim full-face veils have been banned from all public places in France after a controversial law introduced by President Sarkozy in 2011. The Collective Against Islamophobia in France released a statement complaining of “heavy-handedness” and “provocation” by the police during the identity check. (Paris riots sparked by police identity check on veiled Muslim woman, The Guardian, 21st July 2013)

When liberals look at these riots, they don’t see what’s really there: yet more destruction by violent, self-righteous and deeply misogynist non-Whites who despise liberals. Instead, they see a blameless minority crushed by police racism and state oppression. They saw the same thing when Sweden experienced the gratitude of its own rapidly growing non-White “communities” in May 2013:

Hundreds of youth have burned down a restaurant, set fire to more than 340 cars and attacked police during a fourth night of rioting in the suburbs of the Swedish capital, shocking a country that dodged the worst of the financial crisis but failed to solve youth unemployment and resentment among asylum seekers. Violence spread across Stockholm on Wednesday, as large numbers of young people rampaged through the suburbs, throwing stones, breaking windows and destroying cars. … Rioters defied a call for calm from the country’s prime minister, going on the rampage after nightfall damaging stores, schools, a police station and an arts and crafts centre in the four days of violence.

“We see a society that is becoming increasingly divided and where the gaps, both socially and economically, are becoming larger,” said Rami Al-khamisi, co-founder of Megafonen, a group that works for social change in the suburbs. “And the people out here are being hit the hardest … We have institutional racism.”

“The reason is very simple. Unemployment, the housing situation, disrespect from police,” said Rouzbeh Djalaie, editor of Norra Sidan newspaper. (Swedish riots rage for fourth night, The Guardian, 23rd May 2013)


The same tired excuses were produced after the London riots in 2011. In all three nations, non-Whites commit endless crimes against Whites: murder, rape and robbery. They then demand “respect” from the police. When the police don’t supply it, well, what’s an oppressed minority to do but riot? Liberals feed their narcissism by siding with the rioters against the oppressive state. That’s the same state that spends billions of dollars of White tax-payers’ money feeding, clothing and housing the rioters. But if liberals were concerned with reality rather than narcissism, they might see something worrying ahead. This is from the Guardian article about the riots in Paris:

“France is not like it used to be. When I was a child, there wasn’t a problem. I was born here. I was accepted,” says Yetto Souiriy, 37, a mother of five who had been barred from school trips with her son in Montreuil because of her headscarf. (See here)

So that’s a mother of five children. In the same newspaper, you can read about an aborter of five children:

Last week, my boyfriend and I saw our friend’s baby for the second time. The minute I saw the baby, I fell, in every way possible; fell down on the floor and babbled at him for an hour and a half, finally to be rewarded by that singular finger-gripped-by-tiny-fist routine and that priceless gummy smile. … I just knew that there was something in my back pages that I was supposed to be remembering now, probably “wistfully” and preferably tearfully, and just a little cerebral prodding shook it loose. My abortions! All five of them.

“I love babies,” I said, surprised at the simplicity of my statement. And then immediately, perfectly naturally, “I’m so glad I had all those abortions.” … Myself, I’d as soon weep over my taken tonsils or my absent appendix as snivel over those abortions. I had a choice, and I chose life – mine. (Abortion: still a dirty word, The Guardian, 25th May 2002)

Repulsive, but revealing: narcissism leads to nihilism. Muslims are having lots of children. Liberals are aborting lots of children. Does the future look good for liberalism? Or rosy for rioters?


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Narcissism and Nihilism: How Liberals Destroy Themselves by Tobias Langdon

  1. RobRoySimmons says:

    I watch a little bit of stupidvision, couple hours a week and I have caught in the last few years a few episodes of HBO’s “True Blood” and to me it looks like a white man’s interpretation of the self-pitiying jews and their vampirism. I wouldn’t be surprised if at the end of its run they don’t all die the death they deserve. “Deadwood” was written and produced by someone who knows the score as well. I’m not a jewser obsessive but I do notice these things.

    And I’ll say it for the millionth time the vast majority are not looking for our wonderfulness to be expressed via the usual Essays for Egos what they want is liberation from the slurs and the enforcers behind the slurs.

  2. Trainspotter says:

    The mind of the true liberal is a twisted and demented thing, basically cultish in nature. It has no concern for truth or integrity, and instead seems to thrive on making ridiculous claims that are clearly at odds with reality. Racial integration has destroyed literally thousands of once fine schools. But to the liberal? What a white school “needs” is more diversity, which of course will be a good thing, despite all evidence to the contrary. The liberal says this without hesitation or shame.

    The cultish mind is not bothered in the least by gross inconsistency or contradiction. In fact, it seems to revel in it.

    The core tenet of the liberal cargo cult is anti-white, so all of reality must be twisted to conform to that tenet and interpreted through the anti-white lens. What appears to the reasonable observer as inconsistency on the part of liberals is in fact perfect consistency: it is consistently anti-white. This is why the liberal will bemoan wealth inequality in one breath, while promoting mass third world immigration in the next. Or bemoan environmental strain and resource depletion in one breath, and again defend mass non-white immigration in the next. Then he talks about the importance of education, and promptly sets about destroying thousands of schools.

    To a rational individual operating in good faith, holding such positions is ridiculous and contradictory, not holding up against a moment’s scrutiny. But to the liberal, he is being true to his cultish anti-white religion. For him, reality is optional, and so long as he hews to the anti-white position, he can never truly be wrong. He is immune to facts and reason, so it does no good to demolish his position with facts and figures or scholarly treatises.

    He can look at the same thing you or I do, and then promptly draw ridiculous and absurd conclusions from it. But the important point is that his conclusions are only absurd if you’re interested in truth and reality. He’s not.

    For example, take Piers Morgan (please!) and the Zimmerman fiasco. To the rational observer, it is obvious that Trayvon Martin was a thug. Even if you’re sympathetic to Trayvon, even if you’re a thug yourself, it is clear that Trayvon bought into the thug subculture, viewed himself as part of that culture, reveled in it and had a history of acting upon it. That’s just reality, and completely independent of the facts of the Zimmerman case per se. But to Piers Morgan, there is “very little evidence” that Trayvon was a thug. LOL! Very little evidence?

    However absurd and anti-reality, Piers can say this with a straight face and without blushing. Of course, if for some reason it suited the anti-white position for Trayvon to be a thug, then of course he would be, just as Zimmerman became “white” when it suited the anti-whites, but would have been a Rainbow Citizen non-white if the facts had been different. War is Peace, and reality is optional.

    Similarly, for most of us, and I suspect even most blacks, watching that creature Jeantel was an uncomfortable and cringe worthy experience. But to Piers Morgan? She’s a “smart cookie.” LOL! A smart cookie.

    In Piers Morgan World, Trayvon is an upstanding and almost angelic child. In between purchases of tea and skittles, he probably helped little old ladies cross the street and assisted stray orphans. There is no evidence that he was a bad actor. Jeantel should probably be a physicist or something similar, and if she doesn’t, that’s proof positive of institutional racism and white privilege.

    Now, does he *really* believe that in a literal sense? Probably not. But, and normal people can’t understand this, he’s really not lying either. It is likely that he truly believes his bizarre and anti-reality statements at the moment that he is making them. Two minutes later, if it suits him, he may well believe the opposite. Again, reality is optional. I guess it’s possible he’s just a garden variety con man, but I’ve certainly known liberal true believers, so it doesn’t strike me as unlikely that Piers is the real deal.

    The true liberal is a sick, sick thing. The Jew lies effortlessly, without deceiving himself. He takes the anti-white position as a straightforward means of ethnic warfare, so he can easily support an ethnostate for his own tribe, while gnashing his teeth at any mention of one for you. A wall is good to protect his people, but not for you. But the true white liberal is a different sort of critter, a far more pathetic and sick type of botched humanity. I long for the day when we can separate from them entirely, and they can come under the authority of their erstwhile non-white pets. Maybe the Trayvon’s of the future will ultimately enslave, or perhaps even eat them. Good riddance to bad rubbish, and I wouldn’t lift a single finger or utter a single word to protect them.

    • RobRoySimmons says:

      Strip them of their notion of moral superiority, heap responsibility and blame upon them they collapse. Remember they are cult members

  3. trouble says:

    “Your own White tribe could supply you much better, liberals. Whites could organize as Whites and provide for more for ourselves and less for racial others.”

    Not just that but white people could provide *more* for racial others if those others weren’t in the same living space. Liberals could extract far more surplus from a homogenous white nation to spend on others in the non-white world if they hadn’t supported diversity.

    The coming endgame with the HUD database where they have every too-white neighborhood marked out for destruction will prove the point. If they succeed their final destruction of white neighborhoods will destroy the tax base completely.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s