Resisting Defamation on dealing with reporters

Dateline: Sunday, Sep 1, 2013

REPORTERS

Reporters cannot be trusted. One of their favorite tactics is to be very pleasant, and then the minute the camera or recorder is on, they turn abusive and malicious. But remember, even during the pleasantries anything you say can and will be used against you.

However, today I want to bring to your attention the concept of propinquity, an unusual word meaning trying to put a negative label as near to your name as possible. Thus, the devil question [Are you a white supremacist?], long promoted by supremacist organizations like ADL & SPLC, and individuals like Tim Wise & Noel Ignatiev.

Video showing hating by Tim Wise: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfeoNciHbp8

Video showing hating by Noel Ignatiev: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c

The trick is that the intention of the reporter is to put the words white supremacist in the first sentence within four words from your name, whether you admit it or deny it. Some readers will want to own the term, but some genuinely are more white liberationist and do not support the political ideology of white supremacy.

And the first sentence in the article or electronic report will be, “John Smith today denied white supremacist leanings.” The trick, as I said, is that the reporter was the one to raise the issue, with no evidence either way, no remarks by you, and no probable cause to believe it might be true. It is only to put the words “white supremacist” in the first sentence within four words of your name.

Here are today’s five questions asked in the recent past with one or more suggested answer. Pity the white activist who believes that reporters want to understand all the fine points of extended remarks, or your personal point of view. They want to smear you.

You may just want to blow the reporter’s mind and make outrageous claims…always ask, will be answer be attractive to newbies, or will it make them flee screaming? All our actions should be pro-newbie.

Q. What about the Confederate Battle Flag? Nazis? Neo-Nazis? The Holocaust? Jews? Blacks? Mexicans? Voting laws? Food stamps? Welfare? Free speech? Hate speech?
A. In 2013 America, we are worried about hate speech and hate acts directed against our children on the playing field, on the school bus, and in the classroom by bullying and bigoted teachers and students.

Q. Are you in favor of white separatism?
A. Only a separatist of another sort would even think to ask that question.
A. In 2013 America, we are worried about hate speech and hate acts directed against our children on the playing field, on the school bus, and in the classroom by bullying and bigoted teachers and students.

Q. Why is “racist” old-fashioned?
A. It’s been re-defined so many times since it was invented that it has no consistent meaning.
A. If we have to admonish individuals or institutions for their hatreds toward us, we use bigot, bully, hater, and/or supremacist as appropriate.

Q. What is the state of race relations?
A. Race relations are not our focus, we are worried about hate speech and hate acts directed against our children on the playing field, on the school bus, and in the classroom by bullying and bigoted teachers and students.

Q. What is the most important thing that white activists can or should be doing?
A. Bringing other diverse white Americans together to discuss the political, social, economic, and law enforcement issues of importance to us and our children to sort out priorities, and make plans for lawfully implementing solutions.

That’s it for Sunday, Sep 1, 2013.

Bo Sears

http://www.ResistingDefamation.org

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Resisting Defamation on dealing with reporters

  1. 1. Best answer to the White Supremacist insert or question.

    Before I confirm or deny your appellation, I would like you to state, for the record, how YOU (the reporter) define “White Supremacist.”

    (The reason White activists are always caught flat-footed is because they allow their interrogators to get away with vague smears. If you make them clarify how they define “White Supremacist,” you make THEM display their OWN Anti-White bigotry to the casual observer/listener.)

    2. What about hate crimes and hate speech?

    What about hate hoaxes? In the vast majority of cases of so-called hate crimes, hate speech, and acts of hatred, the perpetrators have been the alleged victims trying to call attention to themselves or push an “anti-hatred” agenda. Yet, while there are already laws on the books against hate crimes, there are no laws against STAGING a hate crime. Primarily because Whites are being framed for these crimes. Logically, these acts should be considered hate crimes in and of themselves, because they incite racial hatred and phobia of Whites. Yet nothing is done. Moreover, even though they have been proven hoaxes time and time again, the media remains consistently and absolutely credulous with every fresh accusation of White racism? Why is that?

    3. What about Neo-Confederates, Neo-Nazis, Non-Whites.

    We believe in freedom of association. Only the individual should determine whether s/he wants to join a group; ANY group.

    4. Are you White Nationalists?

    To be a White Nationalist, there would have to be a White nation to defend. Whites don’t have a nation to call their own anymore. Even their native, indigenous continent of Europe is being flooded by Africans and Asiatics. Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everyone!

    5. Are you White Separatists?

    We believe in freedom of association. Only the individual should determine whether s/he wants to avoid a group; ANY group.

    6. Why is “racism” old-fashioned?

    Racism is NOT old-fashioned. Racist was created in 1932 as a noun and in 1938 as an adjective. The term racism was created in 1936. It’s less than one hundred years old. Prior to its creation, differences in the physiognomies, characteristics, abilities, and natures of the races was widely accepted as a given with no need for endless discussions that go nowhere and resolve nothing. The term was only invented by the Communist Jew, Leon Trotsky nee Lev Davidovich Bronshtein as code for White “bigotry,” thus the term was created to be Anti-White at its inception.

    8. What is the state of race relations?

    Exactly as planned by our incompetent national leadership who foment racial tensions to distract all Americans from the fact that the elite are wiping their behinds with our American Dream of being part of a prosperous middle class by shipping our factories and our jobs overseas while flooding the country and its social systems with desperately poor people from the Third World. If MY administration had such a dismal jobs creation record, I would want my lapdog media to instigate an endless, unproductive conversation about race, too!

    9. What is the most important thing that white activists can or should be doing?

    To convince all Whites that we must do everything necessary and possible to fulfill the fourteen words: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children. Because only we can do so. We can resist and prevent hate speech and hate acts directed against our children on the playing field, on the school bus, and in the classroom by bullying and bigoted teachers and students. We can physically remove our children from dangerous and hostile learning environments. I believe the so-called unbiased press calls that “White Flight.” We can demand the same gavel-to-gavel coverage of Black on White crimes that the media gives to White on Black crimes. We can boycott Anti-White movies, sponsors who feature advertisement that depicts Whites in a demeaning manner, and Anti-White media. We can exercise our vote to oust any politician who is caught actively working against our people’s existence and a future for White Children.

    10. But what about people of color?

    Not our people, not our problem. People of color have their own ethnocentric organizations to tend to their interests. Blacks have the NAACP. Mestizos have La Raza, LULAC, etc. ad nauseum ad infinitum. Whites should focus on fixing what ails Whites; improving White education, working to advance Whites, eradicating White poverty and White drug abuse. We say this to altruistic Whites; instead of jetting off on missions to save Africans in Africa or adopt Asians from Asia, try jumping into your car and tending to poor Whites in Appalachia, jump on your jets and adopt poor White orphans from Eastern Europe. There is a saying in the Bible about worrying more about the log in one’s own eye than the splinter in the eye of one’s neighbor. Whites need to focus on correcting dysfunctional situations for Whites. Let the various people of color take care of their own.

    • Good info although I would have trouble remembering it all. 🙂

      Another bible verse that pertains to taking care of our own is 1Tim 5:8 But if any provide not for his OWN, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

      • clytemnestra57 says:

        Too many White Europeans are Christian for White Interest Advocates NOT to comb through the Bible and pull out key Scripture that supports advocating for White interests.

        A WIA with a good theological background could criticize Whites who go to Africa with Jesus Christ’s splinter-log analogy. He could criticize competitive extraracial altruism with Christ’s description of Pharisees who would showboat by making a big display of their charitable deeds. I’m paraphrasing JC, but he said they weren’t impressing anyone in heaven and the only reward they could expect was from the people they conned with the big act.

        The basic thing that WIAs with a strong theological background need to hammer home is that God gives people their own very narrow jurisdiction to manage. They have too many of their own responsibilities to their own family, their own nation, and their own race to attend to. They have no business butting their noses into stuff outside the jurisdiction given to them by God. They are no benefit to anyone; not their own people or to the other people they insist on ministering to. In fact, in my opinion, the people they are trying to “help” are totally justified in their suspicions of them.

        That is why I am NOT surprised over the fate of hapless White do-gooders in Africa. What happened to Amy Biehl should be expected. Her murder by an angry mob would have never happened in the Appalachians or Eastern Europe. Her death was a classic case of Jesus Christ’s admonition about casting one’s pearls before swine lest they turn and rend ye.

      • You’re a good writer Cly. Have you written to Fox News yet?

        Also, you don’t have to go to the Appalatians or Eastern Europe to find poor White people. They are everywhere if we are willing to look.

        There are some families with small children who could use a kind uncle or aunt type of means to help out with various things. Watch for the young White Walmart worker, restaurant server etc. Most would NEVER ask for help but if you got to know them you might be able to assist them with their little families.

      • @Maureen:

        “You’re a good writer Cly. Have you written to Fox News yet?

        Yes, I have. I wonder if MW keeps a tally of how many anonymous visitors “lurk” at this website. I had fired off a quick email before going to work, figuring that Fox would give it what I call The Chris and Channon Treatment. I remembered that most cable news covered The Knoxville Horror during the air time of their lowest rated shows, at times when they were reasonably sure the vast majority of offline Americans would NOT be watching.

        You could have knocked me over with a feather when Fox covered the baby killing, the Aussie murder AND the WWII vet murder during their prime hours. (I was initially suspicious, thinking it was a slow news day). But I noticed that they duly started some form of gavel to gavel coverage with the arraignments. Moreover, I noticed that they followed up throughout the week.

        I am guessing THREE things happened. Several people lurking at this site quietly emailed Fox and encouraged their friends to do so. Fox saw these emails and was a little intimidated the idea that if Whites turned off Fox in disgust over their non-coverage or token coverage of BoW crime, that they would tune out any war effort on behalf of Israel. Last, but not least, Fox saw their ratings go up appreciably when they actually did some honest coverage of BoW crime for a change. Meaning more ad revenue. KA-CHING!

        The irony is that we used a technique that viewers who want to save a flipping television show from cancellation all the time, just by email alone. Most of these campaigns get more sophisticated than that. They contact both the network and their sponsors who pay for ad revenue. Savvy viewers know that the media-entertainment put the hierarchy of interest in the following order: LOWEST: a quick phone call to their voice messaging system. To the bean counters, one phone call represents a handful of people. MEDIUM: Email, which requires more thought. An email usually represents about a few hundred people HIGH: Snail mail which not only requires thought, but some expense (paper, ink, envelope, stamp, and dropping it into the mail) on your part. Believe it or not, the bean counters think snail mail represents the feelings of thousands of people.

        If Fox’s ratings continue to spike, the other networks, if they want to compete, will have to address BoW crime even if they have to resort to paying that worthless blowhard Timothy Jacob Wise and some other rainbow talking heads to put their own “It’s YT’s Fault Spin on it.” I can hear the sound of some gnashing teeth on this board over that prospect, but even if they tap-dance around it for all they are worth, you force them to acknowledge BoW crime and it serves as an “Echo Chamber Effect.”

        Disingenuous White Liberals can dramatically clutch the pearls and declare, “Well, I never,” and take potshots at the messenger, but you can be damn well sure that, despite all the pious grandstanding and showboating, they will HEED the messenger and put in their own laws and covenants restricting the behavior of feral Bantus and Mestizos. IOW, “Hipster Racism.”

        While publicly decrying their hypocrisy WIAs can ignore what they SAY and study what they DO in order to incorporate their tactics to keep their OWN neighborhoods safe, so it’s all good.

      • clytemnestra57 says:

        @Maureen:

        “There are some families with small children who could use a kind uncle or aunt type of means to help out with various things. Watch for the young White Walmart worker, restaurant server etc. Most would NEVER ask for help but if you got to know them you might be able to assist them with their little families.”

        Excellent idea. There are so many Whites who have awakened late without having children of their own. When they die, they usually leave their money to a charity or there is no beneficiary whatsoever, so the insurance or pension fund gets to pocket it.

        First and foremost, these childless seniors should be encouraged to find their nearest young relative with young White children who is struggling and help them out. But even better, quietly make them their beneficiaries in case they die. It should start in the family, but then fan out to the White children and grandchildren of friends.

        Last, but not least, I think that older White singles or childless couples could and should be encouraged to adopt older White children languishing in the foster care systems. They would soon have grandchildren to call their own once these adolescents come of age, get married and have children of their own.

        But even if there is no immediate family with children or family of friends who are struggling, I still encourage such people to check into Appalachian White charities and Eastern European White charities. Just. Because.

      • Wow such great news about Fox! Made my day! Let’s keep the pressure on!

        Great ideas regarding helping White families…and do what you can BEFORE you die and the state gets their filthy claws on your estate. PLEASE.

        I would like to adopt a White foster child someday. I wonder if you are allowed to make sure you get a White child. Does one have a choice?

  2. White Dragon says:

    This article about public education has been getting attention in the blogs. It shows how mentally-ill, delusional, and ultimately self-destructive the liberals are.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/private_school_vs_public_school_only_bad_people_send_their_kids_to_private.html#

    I am not an education policy wonk: I’m just judgmental. But it seems to me that if every single parent sent every single child to public school, public schools would improve. This would not happen immediately. It could take generations. Your children and grandchildren might get mediocre educations in the meantime, but it will be worth it, for the eventual common good.

    As rotten as my school’s English, history, science, social studies, math, art, music, and language programs were, going to school with poor kids and rich kids, black kids and brown kids, smart kids and not-so-smart ones, kids with superconservative Christian parents and other upper-middle-class Jews like me was its own education and life preparation. Reading Walt Whitman in ninth grade changed the way you see the world? Well, getting drunk before basketball games with kids who lived at the trailer park near my house did the same for me. In fact it’s part of the reason I feel so strongly about public schools.

    Meanwhile Rahm Emmanuel and Barack Obama send their kids to private school.

  3. There is no reason to have any contact with reporters or the media. Using the media to gain publicity, to inform large numbers of people about your cause and create a mass of people to support your political program, is a feature of mass politics and the open political system. This system is 1) as phony as a three-dollar bill and 2) can only function as a trap for pro-whites.

    Don’t contact them, and if they contact you, “I have nothing to say.”

    • Brandon says:

      What thrasy said…

      • Ryu says:

        I am also with Thrashy. Going on their TV is stepping onto their ground. They can make me look as they like.

        Now, if a reporter wants to come onto MY show and be interviewed, it’s a different story. I control the temp, lighting, editing, sound, etc. I’m always willing to fight on my ground, but never on their ground.

      • Brandon says:

        Yep. They are the enemy’s spokesidiots. Their job is to make us look bad. Why the hell would any smart WN submit to that? They have the sentence of death on their heads because they represent a system which has a death wish.

  4. Heligoland says:

    How’s this for propinquity?

    Tim “Tick-Tock” Wise

    Susan “The-Cancer-Of-Human-History” Sontag

    Noel “Race-Loyalist” Ignatiev (i.e., he is loyal to his race, the Jews)

  5. @thrachymasus33308:

    I agree with you on certain points, but respectfully disagree with you on others. I agree with you that White Interest Advocates sabotage themselves by going onto these “news” shows where they are sure to be ganged up on and tripped up by sophistry coming from all directions. That is what hurt WIAs under the old “open” political model under WN v. 1.0.

    However, the internet can and should be used as an important media tool under WN v.2.0 IF WIAs approach WN v.2.0 as a MARKETING tool. Marketing is an invaluable tool. It convinces people to buy all kinds of stuff they can really live without. I can remember when Microsoft PCs were kicking Apple’s ass. Apple somewhat improved their products with a few little tweaks and a little innovation. But even then, Apple found some skilled marketers who changed Apple’s image into something edgy and hip to convince people to buy Apple Macs and I-Phones they can barely afford. Why can’t good marketing convince White people that it is not only NOT UNCOOL but edgy and avant garde to advocate for their own interests?

    The first thing that I am proposing is a crisp, professional looking website with a FAQs link. Here, WIAs can comb through past shows, cull out the most hostile, Anti-White “questions” and post intelligent, succinct responses, i.e., “Talking Points” for people to read. If a journalist calls the WIA for an interview, s/he can be directed to the FAQs link of the website and if s/he has any additional questions, would be required to email the site with the question which would then be added to and answered on the FAQs link.

    The website could then get contributors and cartoonists that would give it an edgy, subversive, underground feel. Three books that WIAs should study are Machiavelli, The Art of War, and Rules for Radicals. I really like Hipster Racist’s snarky approach. The two-front attack approach of ridicule and criticism has been very effective in dismantling the dominance of Anglo-Americans as out of touch reactionary dinosaurs who are not “with it.” If you think about it, it was the constant sneering, jeering, and carping of the folks in the back seat that, in essence, made Anglo-America give up the wheel in exasperation to the back seat drivers who are now driving the country off the cliff.

  6. A.Ralston says:

    @Clytemnestra

    “First and foremost, these childless seniors should be encouraged to find their nearest young relative with young White children who is struggling and help them out. But even better, quietly make them their beneficiaries in case they die. It should start in the family, but then fan out to the White children and grandchildren of friends.

    Last, but not least, I think that older White singles or childless couples could and should be encouraged to adopt older White children languishing in the foster care systems. They would soon have grandchildren to call their own once these adolescents come of age, get married and have children of their own. ”

    Interesting advice.

    Now that I am midway throught my seventh decade, my major regret is that I married way too late and did not have children. I am still fertile, I believe, but my wife is post-menopausal. By the time I emerged from 22 years of formal and mostly irrelevant education, a stint in Viet Nam, a number of false career starts, a few flower-child years as a spiritual seeker in the New Mexico mountains, etc etc, I was just too screwed up – and knew I was – to assume normal manly responsibilities.

    In the last year or so, however, my wife and I have decided to do exactly what you propose with the modest legacy that we have managed to extricate, shall we say, from the fiat banking matrix and that we intend to keep outside the reach of the court system – a micro version of the RedShield strategy, at least in concept. We do not trust any charity registered with the IRS. My 93 yo Mom, who is still a practicing lawyer (and the oldest living WW2 Marine Corps veteran in my home state) continues to handle probate cases for a few select clients older than she and has been advising me in these matters, while I have been educating her in WN.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s