Progressive concepts: why you should use them

White privilege exists. And I like it. Patriarchy exists. And it’s moral and a necessary pre-condition to the development of civilization. The personal is the political: women, especially in the home, constantly congruence-test men for control, even if they don’t actually want the control themselves. Power relations are important. Power dynamics are pervasive, but appropriating the concept doesn’t entail a transformation into a well-adjusted adult into a skulking tranny.

All it means is that you have to make peace with accepting radical positions–radical positions which almost certainly imply social ostracization, if you can’t’ control the frame, demonstrate high value, and rigorously defend your positions and deconstruct leftist axioms.


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Progressive concepts: why you should use them

  1. RobRoySimmons says:

    I agree with it but it would be a very rare polemicist who could get away with this in an interview or debate. Most people get taken off track by the other side and start wandering around the details and simply cannot dominate and deconstruct. Trainspotter is a bad ass he could, but most WNs will end up being reactionary stooges defending things like kristalnact or niggerwhoopin and doing so ineffectively at that.

  2. Maureen Martin, Aryan Street says:

    The Bugsters (Bob Whitaker and White Rabbit Radio folks) have it right!

    Anti-racists” never complain about Chinese privilege in China.
    “Anti-racists” never complain about Japanese privilege in Japan.
    “Anti-racists” never complain about Nigerian privilege in Nigeria.
    “Anti-racists” ONLY complain about White privilege in White countries.
    “Anti-racists” WANT White geNOcide!
    They say they’re “anti-racist”, what they are is anti-White.
    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White.

  3. Maureen Martin, Aryan Street says:

    Oh yeah and another one I like is when the convo is getting too boring and fact filled and you need to get things back on track you say, “Meanwhile, back on planet earth, ONLY White countries are being forced to “assimilate” with a global herd of 3rd-worlders. What “anti-racists” are advocating is a world with no more White people, just more brown people.

  4. Maureen Martin, Aryan Street says:

    forgot to add a quotation mark at the end.

  5. Peter Blood says:

    Way to roll a hand grenade into the middle of a group, Maureen!

    On a tangent, I was reading a tech news site and there was an argument over technical details in the comments. One person called another a troll. The retort: “eat a d***, you jew” JEW as a random epithet!

    Rob Roy: you are right, I am too much of a hothead myself, that would happen, so I usually stay out of it.

  6. “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

    ― George Carlin

    I think the best response to liberal positions is body language. Be expressive. If they say something self-serving and hypocritical, smirk at them cynically. Raise your eyebrows. Snort derisively, shake your head and then walk off.

    Remember that they WANT you to argue with them. It means that the subject is open to debate and that you are open to compromise. Refuse to be drawn in.

    “The dogs may bark, but the caravan moves on.”

    ― Old Persian Proverb

    It is highly doubtful that a WNist is going to win any liberal over to his position during a debate. Remember that this are Paychex Liberals and the chances of such a person conceding defeat and actually agreeing with a WN in PUBLIC are none at all.

    Oh, but you may say this is about winning over The Undecided. Unless The Undecided are brain-dead, chances are that they are much more aware about the racial realities than we think they are, even on an implicit level.

    The next question we must ask ourselves is if it is really wise for WNists to take the position that we must save DWLs from our enemy or if they are an enemy of ours themselves? If the White elite consider White working and middle class people the enemy (and by their very words and actions. they do), should White working and middle class not reciprocate? Why not leave them to the enemy which has historically stabbed their White collaborators in the back every single time?!

    Don’t believe me? Read your history books. When nations go extinct, it isn’t necessarily the genome of its citizens that are wiped out. There may be some suffering involved like when a middle class slides into poverty, but they aren’t necessarily eradicated.

    When nations/civilizations are destroyed, it is the elites who are destroyed with them. It is the elites who have an interest in safeguarding the people of their cultures, nations, and civilizations. It is the elites who ultimately pay a price when they turn on their own people and they should pay the price AFAIC.

    Their genome deserves to be wiped out. So any time some WNist is in an area populated with DWLs (ESPECIALLY if s/he is in such an area) and s/he sees a mixed race couple with a “biracial” child, they should rejoice and think of it as instant karma. Just think of the secret consternation of DWLs who are horrified to discover that their not-so-smart daughters bought their whole “no such thing as races” dogma hook, line, and sinker and presented them not only with a black thug boyfriend, but a little Barack Obama and chortle with glee.

    Last, but not least, every minute some racially aware White male is wasting as he papers some White neighborhood with flyers about White genocide and extinction (all so they can notify the media and clutch the pearls and squawk indignantly, “Well, I never!” as they carry on like drama queens) could be spent finding a White female to impregnate.

    WNists need to take a page from our Mestizo invaders who realized very early in the game that White Americans were not having White children and that Reconquista was not a war to be won at gunpoint but through the cradle. Well, if you think about it, our own positions are very similar to the Mestizos when it comes to DWLs. Conservative Whites (who don’t believe in abortion) already have the cradle advantage over DWLs who limit their families or don’t have children at all. WNists need to put that advantage into “hyperdrive.”

    Oh, but you say that you want to wait until you can “afford” a family. Remember that old saw about “the best laid plans of mice and men.” Second, as one Black woman I worked with noted, many Whites waited until they were “established” to have children and they still found themselves and their children on the streets when the economy went south in 2008-2009. Life is not risk-free.

    Self-loathing DWLs should not be saved from themselves, but should be encouraged in their folly. For our own racial survival, we need the genes of ANY White who would collaborate with our enemy to die out ASAP. Our time is better spent having offspring who we can raise as White race realists and then encouraging them to marry early and breed as many White race realists as possible.

    • mindweapon says:

      I don’t know if behavior is determined by genetics to that much of a degree, Cly. Those DWL’s could very well produce a great White nationalist leader because of the adversity of being a child of a DWL.

      • clytemnestra57 says:


        I may deplore his Utoya Antics, but I totally agree with Breivik in wanting to see these treacherous bastards die out. DWLs will most likely breed more DWLs and only an “Act of God” is going to produce a great WNist Leader from the loins of two DWLs. Luckily, they have very treacherous allies who are already in the process of stabbing them in the back as they have always historically done.

        That means it is the DWLs who will fall for the okie-dokie and either limit or forego having biological children at all (through either a childless lifestyle or African adoptions to really make a statement). If they abort their own offspring rather than see their own lifestyles subjected to the horror of moving to Staten Island and shopping at Costco, so much the better. Yes, I know it sounds cold-blooded, but when an enemy screws up, it’s best to sit on one’s hands and let them rather than trying to save them from themselves.

        Instead, we need to take a page from La Raza’s playbook and wage The War of the Cradle against our enemies. The DWLs’ “allies” understand that Demographics is Destiny which is why any articles aimed at having White offspring involve in either limiting them or eliminating them altogether by exaggerating the costs of raising them to adulthood. For some strange reason, one publication … I think it was The New York Times … estimated the costs of raising a White child to adulthood to be at least a quarter of a million dollars. Oddly enough, it didn’t cost Negros, Mestizos, or even high-achieving Asian families that much. It’s a mystery for the ages, dontcha know?

      • anon334 says:

        Maybe. There is certain evidence that ethnocentrism has a biological/heritable basis.

      • mindweapon says:

        I wonder to what degree though? I suspect DWL’s can have race loyal white children.

  7. RobRoySimmons says:

    There have been experiments that show the brain is pretty much set when it comes to politics and IMO theology. We are not there to convert libs, we are there to make an example of a lib or better yet have the lib become a mouth foaming dangerous sounding crank. I could give a shit about if I ever convert a lib, I could give a shit if a lib ever thinks of me as smart (this is truly a WN’s waste of time), we are there to sway the vast middle that the libtard anti-white vermin are immoral dangerous cranks who eat white babies (probably true in Africa). The East German border guards did not read anti-communist essays, but one day they knew that they were on the wrong side of history and what they used to do was now immoral.

    Defy, Dominate and Deconstruct the anti-whites.

    • RobRoySimmons says:

      Thread jack alert. Back to Penis Jew, his hilarious rumination on penises aside it would have been really interesting how such an idiot became such an anti-white. Do jewish families sit around and brainwash their children to take up genocide, is it their religious/social leaders who promote white genocide.

      To me that is interesting, penis discussion not so interesting. But that is the same with all white anti-whites, they are basically idiots, but how were they inducted into their cult is what I would like to know.

  8. RobRoySimmons says:

    The vast middle is inducted to some degree into an anti-white cult, and they mouth the shibboleths because it rewards them with good brain chems and social approval, but it is not reason.

    So I’m at Counter Currents reading a review of Breaking Bad and some poor kid comments that he is distraught that his parents call him bad names, “Nazi”, “klansman” ect, ect. And the kid tries to respond with essays of reason and the cycle moves ever lower.

    All the various reasons people join a cult like this can be flushed away with the notion of Karmic Retribution is perched just over their heads , that responsibility that thing they avoid is going to be place squarely on their shoulders. The mere notion of being held responsible overcomes the brain chemical treats in your average person. So the poor kid has no recourse except reason to people who are beyond reason and all CC can do for him is to sell him an Evola book, he needs to learn how to deprogram cultists.

  9. Cranberry says:

    I don’t have to beat my opponent. I just have to spur the audience to thought. A leftist may never question his premises, but his emergent supporters might.

    These are the people to target. These are the minds to win.

    • mindweapon says:

      Absolutely! If I ever get a chance to confront a leftist speaker on a college campus speech, I’m going to attack him or her on two bases:

      1. Liberals took away summer jobs to give to Mex.

      2. LIberals took away the 2 parent family with easy divorce laws and the promotion of hedonism and bashing the family as “patriarchal” and oppressive. When liberals say “smash the patriarchy” that’s a fancy term for saying, “smash fathers” since patriarch is just a fancy word for father. Gauging by the millions of American children who grow up without a father helping raise them, looks like they succeeded. Good job liberals! Kids don’t need fathers or summer jobs, right! Good job protecting the children!

    • RobRoySimmons says:

      The vast majority of whites want to be good people and that is how the left traps them. Spewing reams of facts and details without addressing the need of people to be seen as good is a mistake.

      • clytemnestra57 says:


        No, RRS. The vast majority of Whites don’t necessarily want to be “good people.”

        Like too many other White Nationalists you, totally underestimate “The Lemming Effect.”

        Most Whites are very social people who don’t have very strong racial, religious, or ideological convictions and simply want to fit in. Right now, the system is such that they have to engage in the most pretzelish contortions imaginable to fit in. It’s not very comfortable, but they do so anyway, because rather than drawing the wrath of the ADL and SPLC on their heads, it seems to them like the path of least resistance.

        However, if WNists can create strong PLEs with large close-knit WNist communities composed of strong, stable families full of White children headed by two happily married White parents … if these communities have lots of fun, low-keyed social events that give Cass Sunstein nightmares like bowling leagues, baseball leagues, basketball leagues, football leagues, sewing and quilting circles, etc. ad infinitum, then The Lemming Effect dictates that Whites who move there will follow suit and create their own strong WNist families.

        WNists could buy up cheap plots in decaying communities like Craig Cobb did, but eschew his Fascist Flagpole Folly. What ticks me off is that the Leith PLE idea could have worked if it had been promoted as an inexpensive way for men working in the oil fields to have their families close by. Leith was perfectly situated between two large fields and the rents in the nearby towns was ridiculous. If these oil field workers had bought up these plots and abandoned homes in areas like Leith and moved their families out there, the new residents could have bought two old school buses to ferry the workers to each field and the wives could have stayed home and raised/homeschooled the children.

        If discretion had been practice and an IMPLICIT PLE had been formed, by the time Mark Potok found out and got his panties in a twist over it, Leith would have been enjoying such an infusion of taxes from new businesses and taxpaying landowners that it would have been easier for Leith to ignore Potok or to find a polite way to tell Potok to either pony up the money to pay for all of this himself or bugger off and mind his own damned business.

  10. Cranberry says:

    Yeah, but, the patriarchy is really the matriarchy…or is it vice-versa, since women would generally be the distributors of food…I don’t know. Either way, it’s the fault of someone other than me, and we are all equal except when others (except for Libs!) make the playing-field uneven.

    Leftist logic just makes my ears ring.

    This strategy is an extension of the agree-and-amplify strategy. It is so very useful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s