The Affirmative Action Military; Good news for us

Not even the honor code is enforced any more.

The honor code was a really big deal with military academies. Get caught lying? Get drummed out. On your way out, with your bags packed, your former classmates turn away from you as you walk past them.

Then, Pig was caught trying to steal gas from Will’s car. He was put on trial and convicted of being dishonorable and was kicked out of school. He had to go down “The Walk of Shame”, where all the cadets turn their backs on him as he passes.

I couldn’t find the clip on youtube, but it’s a great clip. Definitley rent the movie “The Lords of Discipline” some time.


Academy honor cases focus on redemption, not expulsion

Posted: Sunday, November 1, 2009 12:00 am
By EARL KELLY, Staff Writer
Despite its reputation for setting high standards, the Naval Academy rarely dismisses anyone for lying, cheating or stealing, according to thousands of pages of documents obtained by concerned graduates under the federal Freedom of Information Act.
It’s a disturbing trend, these graduates contend, because Naval Academy midshipmen, as junior officers, become responsible for weapons systems, national security and the welfare of the young men and women who enlist in the Navy and Marine Corps.

LOL diversity

In what the Washington Post called the biggest bribery case “the Navy has confronted in years,” the skipper of a naval cruiser and a senior logistics officer allegedly gave classified information to a contractor regarding ship movements, in exchange for prostitutes, tickets to Lady Gaga concerts (!!!), and cash. The information, which imperiled national security, was allegedly used by the contractor to defraud the Navy (i.e., the white American net tax base) out of millions of dollars.

The two main defendants:

Cmdr. Michael Misiewicz, code-name “Brudda, ”Cambodian birth name “Vannak Khem.” He was adopted by Army administrative assistant Maryna Misiewicz and benefitted from a Navy Affirmative Action program, with got a slot that should have gone to a qualified, white American… and (allegedly) paid back his adoptive country by selling it out.
Leonard Francis, CEO of Glenn Defense Marine Asia, known widely as “Fat Leonard,” “Lion King” and “Boss,” is a Malaysian national based out of Singapore.
Three others are also charged: senior logistics officer Cmdr. Jose Luis Sanchez; senior Navy investigator, Naval Criminal Investigative Service Supervisory Special Agent John Bertrand Beliveau II, who allegedly funneled inside information about the investigation to Francis; and Francis’ subordinate Alex Wisidagama. [3 arrested in international Navy bribery scheme, AP/Washington Times, September 18, 2013; Third Navy official arrested in bribery probe by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, November 6.]

And then there’s Two men married at West Point chapel.

Tovarish Putin! Nye boisya Ameriki! Pobyedyetye!

US hegemony is backed by the dollar, which is backed by US military might, which is backed by diversity that doens’t have a real honor code in its service academies.

I guess that’s why they need drones. But a corrupt officer class will sell the codes to the drones to the guerillas in exchange for wine, women and song (and maybe some lines of Bolivian marching powder!).

My pessimistic friends Tabula Raza and Pluto the Dog, let this bit of news cheer you up! This is Peak Chutzpah. This is a Potemkin village of a country.


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to The Affirmative Action Military; Good news for us

  1. Ryu says:

    It’s fantastic news. The fewer white men in the US military, the better. Third world militaries are known for their corruption and inefficiency. The only thing they truly excel at is brutality.

    • mindweapon says:

      Matthew Bracken, the former Navy Seal and author of books like “Enemies, Foreign and Domestic” who posts at Western Rifle Shooters, believes that Obama wants to weaken the military on purpose. Michael Savage also puts forth this theory. I’m not sure what to think of it — it doesn’t make sense to me, but the evidence for it is overwhelming.

      Can anybody explain why Obama would want to purposely weaken the US military?

      • Jon says:

        Imo, it is coming mostly from patriotard version of jock-sniffers that worship the military. Fine to have when your nation is comprised overwhelmingly of your coethnics and there’s no chance of it being turned against the citizens or blowback from imposing it where it doesn’t belong (Germany, Korea, Vietnam, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, etc).

      • mindweapon says:

        that’s fine, but do you suppose there’s any truth to it? Do you think Obama is purposely weakening the military? Not that that’s a bad thing, but it adds a real twist to the whole thing if it’s true.

      • Jon says:

        I don’t know but they said the same about Carter and that was mostly unjustified and sounded like the same thing as those who criticise conservatives for weakening the socialist “safety net”. I would ask them what specifically they mean by “weaken” (a 100 or 200 billion less from the land that overwhelmingly spends more just on overseas military bases than any other spends on the entire military is not weakening in my lexicon). If they’re talking about firing flag officers and replacing them with incompetent yes-“persons”, they might have a point.

      • mindweapon says:

        Well, Matthew Bracken is a pretty credible source on this, moreso than Mikey Savage. It’s not just about spending cuts, but the imperial over-reach combined with getting rid of the honor system in the military academies.

        I did a semester at Norwich University, went through the hazing, got through rookdom and recognized as a cadet, and over winter break decided to go to a more academically oriented college. We had a serious honor code, at least as far as we knew. Probably they would not have drummed people out for lying if they were paying big bucks in tuition though. But we didn’t know that. We thought we were under a real hard core honor code, and the upperclassmen told us we were. One time my dorm, “Kilo Company” was all working on some project and everyone except me was dipping Skoal. They got caught and forced to confess. They asked, “Did anyone not dip Skoal?” and I said I didn’t. They got all excited, thinking they had me on an honor code violation, and they asked everyone, “Ddi anyone see (me) dip?” Everyone said “no.” But it was one of those moments where tension hung in the air — that they might catch me in an honor code violation and throw me out. They ended up punishing me by putting dip in my buccal cavity (between lip and lower front gums). I got dizzy and they made me do pushups, hopihng I’d vomit.

        Another dorm had a guy who got a care package of turkey sandwiches because they didn’t let us eat. I would eat lots of vending machine food any chance I got. Anywayw, he didn’t pick up the turkey sandwiches for several days and the bread had mold and the mayonaise was bad. They made the rooks eat he turkey sandwiches, and when people puked, they made them dip their sandwiches in the puke and eat that. No joke, I heard it from someone who it happened to.

        2 years later one rook went crazy, went to Virginia and stabbed prostitutes to death and blamed it on his hazing at Norwich.

        So yeah, I went through the “Lords of Discipline” thing. They actually talked about that movie and were consciously copying it. Norwich University has TONS of scholarship money but very few academically strong students. They offered me a full ride to stay. I should have taken it! And I should have majored in computer science. Oh well, hindsight.

        But if you want to study and go to college for free in Vermont and tolerate some hazing, Norwich may work for you. If you have high SAT scores and good grades, apply to them but then refuse to go unless they give you a full free ride. IT’s real nice up there in Vermont. Those guys party like crazy. They used to have a volunteer fire department, but some cadets responded to a fire when they were drunk and crashed and died. No more Norwich U fire department. I remember seeing the memorial and hearing the story. THey also have a skull and bones type secret society, they call it skull and swords.

      • Mr. Rational says:

        The question is, is this likely to backfire?  If the view from the enlisted ranks and lieutenants is that the top brass has been suborned or outright replaced with traitors to their oath to defend the Constitution, is it more or less likely that any order to e.g. confiscate private weapons will be met by standing down or outright rebellion?

      • Francis the talking mule says:

        “Can anybody explain why Obama would want to purposely weaken the US military?”
        Liberal = small or damaged amygdala. Amygdala = the brain’s threat recognition center.

        Liberals feel safe. They feel safer than they’ve felt in a long time, maybe ever. Liberals see an institution full of white Christian heterosexual males and they must fix that.

        They’re not worried about a potential violent backlash and they’re not worried about the military failing them when they need it, because they’re just not very good at recognizing potential dangers. If they were, they probably wouldn’t be liberals.

      • The answer lies in The Mystery of Obama’s Two Websites, Mindweapons. The technicians he used for a website dedicated to his own purposes was constructed by the best, most qualified White geeks he could find. The technicians he used for the Obamacare Website were all Affirmative Action Diversity Hires.

        During one of his campaigns, Obama mentioned that he would like to create another kind of military on domestic soil; a military that is not hindered by the Posse Comitatus Act which prohibits any President or Congress from directing, by military order or federal legislation, the imposition of federal troops in any state of the Union. Of course, such a military would only be answerable to the Commander in Chief.

        To get a good idea of what such a domestic military might look like, one only has to look at countries whose leaders use a private security agency to protect their important projects while leaving the protection of the people they rule to the protection of their country’s corrupt and incompetent military.

        Ordinarily their regular military is not capable of staging a coup d’état in the interests of protecting the people from a tyrannical regime. More likely, they are themselves, robbing, raping, and terrorizing the population. There will never be a question that they will rebel against the government rather than kill the people on the orders of their government, as long as they get paid and are allowed to victimize the people themselves.

        Yet the ultra-rich invite kidnappings by people who envious their luxurious lifestyles, so they need a military that is least likely to collude with potential kidnappers, so they can’t use the “regular” military of corrupt, inept, dishonest gangbangers; they need a military who they can trust not to open the gates, so they recruit Whites.

        During the Iraq War, countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia used the “security agency,” Blackwater, which was more a private mercenary army composed of former Navy seals and other elite special ops military men. That is why I suggested that Whites with military experience acquire their own private security niche, because they will be in high demand as the military all over what used to be the Western World brown out.

    • Jon says:

      Some good “propaganda of colour” would involve the idea that the ASVAB is racist and malign-encourage a lawsuit like Griggs v. Duke Power or US et. al. v. City of New York, not only for entrance to the military but for all the technical ratings and MOSs. Affirmative action, baby. Such a lawsuit, if successful, is an obvious win for us (and not just American WNs but anyone adversely affected by the American military adventuring). And if it got any publicity, it should be a win for us no matter the outcome.

    • Jon says:

      I don’t see how Obama should be blamed to the lax honour code at military colleges. I think it’s just the decadence of this time catching up to institutions that have been in the past better able to resist it — everything incremental — first you’re dishonourably discharged, then don’t ask; don’t. tell, and now the Navy Seal Team butt-slamming each other. To see it as Obama’s fault misses the bigger picture (he’s just teh banksters’ puppet, after all and would be in if he went rogue) and is a petit partisan conclusion.

  2. Craig says:

    The Marines and SF are majority white, pretty switched on, the general forces are remembered for the high numbers of Mexicans and blacks, plus the dysfunction that goes with it.

    It seems plausible that Obama and the democrats generally don’t mind weakening the military, we have the same here in Australia with Labor and the Greens. It seems the leftists are trying to help out the Eurasianists geopolitically. Not only militarily but also via mindwar of our children, particularly if you read the current federal curriculum in both our countries.

    I’ve noticed the majority of the conservative politicians in Aus and US are Atlantists and the Liberal Progressives Eurasianists or they at least seem some what favourable to that position. Particularly with child mindwar in the curriculum.

  3. Craig says:

    Plus the ABC BBC seems to favour Eurasianist propaganda that hurts Atlantism, this week the (Australian)ABC and one of the BBC propaganda news outlets, leaked out some Snowdon files of Australian spying, which stoked Indonesian Nationalism, and further weakened our borders…

    It’s hard to tell where this is all going, particularly with Putin and the backing of Nationalism, yet all the Progressive Liberal news outlets support a anti-white type Eurasianism.

  4. Brandon says:

    O is a puppet and his job is to destroy, so yes, he is deliberately doing it.. When you hold the conspiracy view of history and politics you get everything right.

  5. StukaPilot says:

    Obama is trying to strike a delicate balance: weaken/control the military to a point where it will not threaten his regime when, in the wake of PonziCollapse, he declares Martial Law…but leave it strong enough to win Civil War II. Have a little pity for our would-be Stalin…right this instant he’s sitting in the WH Inner Sanctum, chain-smoking. Thinking doom-laden thoughts. His doom or ours? Time will tell.

  6. A.Ralston says:

    Interesting stats from the Capitol Gazette article, the second link in your post:

    “Whites constitute 76 percent of the brigade and commit 55 percent of the violations, while African-Americans make up 5 percent of the brigade and commit 19 percent of the violations, according to Naval Academy data. Asians and Hispanics make up 5 percent and 10 percent of the brigade, respectively, and commit 6 percent and 14 percent of the honor violations, respectively.”

    I notice from the article that Annapolis now refers to it as a Concept (flexible, fuzzy, subject to interpretation, effeminate) rather than a Code (rigid, clear, incontrovertible, masculine)

    Don’t like discussing it too openly online, but I’m a West Point grad from the late 60’s. During our first 24 hours at WP just one month out of high school ( the ultra hellish introduction to “Beast Barracks”), one of the first iron rules we learned was – and I quote – you don’t fuck with the Honor Code. It was simple: “A cadet does not lie, cheat, or steal, or tolerate those who do.” That’s it. No one was exempt, regardless of class or rank.

    During my Yearling (second) year, two good friends, one rather close, were expelled in less than 24 hours after the Honor Board determined that their actions, related to a cheating ring, had violated the Code. One was the son of the academy’s premier Russian professor and the other the son of the U.S. Army Chief of Staff on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the country’s highest ranking Army officer at that time. There was no quarter given to either of these guys, despite their fathers’ potential influence, and AFAIK both fathers accepted the Honor Board’s findings without question or appeal.

    The troublesome part about the Honor Code was its last five words requiring one not to “tolerate those who do.” If you knew your roommate or your best buddy had committed a violation, you were honor-bound to report it. This stricture could often put one’s innate sense of honor in conflict with the Code itself, inasmuch as most red-blooded self-respecting White men that I know all have a deeply ingrained distaste for snitching. For this reason my survival tack was, metaphorically speaking, to keep my own eyes forward and my attention focused on my own damn business. I did not want to hear, see, or otherwise know how my friends responded to our superiors when confronted with certain questions about sensitive matters. A violation of regulations may result in a draconian penalty, such as “marching the area” for hundreds of hours, but not necessarily expulsion. Only a violation of the Honor Code would result automatically and immediately in dismissal from the academy.

    A humorous ploy often used by upper classmen while we stood in formation rigidly at attention (“braced”) was to openly ask a Plebe whether he, the Plebe, had banged the girl seen last Sunday afternoon cavorting with him behind the Chapel. Since only three responses are allowed when questioned by a superior – Yes Sir, No Sir, or No Excuse Sir – said upperclassman would let the Plebe suffer in an angonizingly tense paralysis for a while before retracting the question. If the Plebe had in fact sexed his girlfriend, he dare not lie lest someone who may have actually seen him in the act with the girl would be honor-bound to report the lie. If he tells the truth, he violates his lover’s honor and his own self-respect. This happened to my roommate more than a few times. Since I usually knew about his trysts in a hidden cubby hole behind the massive Cadet Chapel organ, my own position would have become dodgy no matter how he answered. Fortunately he was a tough, wily, loyal guy who always took his punishment if necessary for remaining steadfastly silent.

    In the two honor cases mentioned above, neither of the guys had personally cheated. Both were academically gifted and had helped a few of their jock friends on the football team (IIRC) to pass a certain English class loathed by most cadets and a particularly difficult engineering (again IIRC) class. By abetting, they had knowingly “tolerated” someone else’s cheating. The whole affair was a hard blow for me personally, because the Russian professor’s son was a fellow aficionado of English lit and grammar and therefore a rare kindred soul in a strictly regimented, physical-sciences milieu.

    My alma mater’s Marxist multi-cultural, feminist degeneration disgusts me. Ironic, isn’t it, that my explicit pining for Aryan values which once imbued the U.S. Military Academy now puts me, a hermitic (and Hermetic) old guy, squarely in the ZOG’s radar scan as a potential domestic terrorist.

    • mindweapon says:

      Wow a West Point grad? And two guys expelled for helping jocks pass? Amazing!

      I would have been expelled, now that you mention it. I would do English papers and business papers and history papers for the cadre who were torturing me in exchange for food. I didn’t even think for a second that these were violations of the honor code. Even then we’d gotten soft compared to your time.

      It is quite ironic that honest and honor bound men are now the bad guys. Oh well, let them enjoy their Captain Vannak Khems selling out their commission for a mess of pottage. These guys will be easy to bribe in the guerilla war.

      That’s why one of the things I emphasize is being able to grow and process booze, tobacco and other things. These things may be what you use to bribe the counter-insurgency commanders. We won’t fight the counter-insurgency troops directly; we’ll degenerate them slowly, and lull them into complacency, and provide them with cover for fake operations where they catch common criminals dressed as “insurgents.” (LOL).

  7. TabuLa Raza says:

    right this instant he’s sitting in the WH Inner Sanctum, chain-smoking

    What has he been smokiing?

  8. TabuLa Raza says:

    My alma mater’s Marxist multi-cultural, feminist degeneration

    Let us take an ahem, disciplined look at the word DEGENERATE. Many think a person is degenerate if they are slack, with loose morals. Same for an entire society.

    Looking at the word, I see GENE in there. Yet online dictionaries fail to mention biological rot. . .
    Try etymology of degeneration: OK, here we go-

    degenerate (adj.) Look up degenerate at
    late 15c., from Latin degeneratus, past participle of degenerare “to be inferior to one’s ancestors, to become unlike one’s race or kind, fall from ancestral quality,” used of physical as well as moral qualities, from phrase de genere, from de + genus (genitive generis) “birth, descent” (see genus). The noun is from 1550s.

    degenerate (v.) Look up degenerate at
    1540s, from Latin degeneratus, past participle of degenerare “fall from ancestral quality” (see degenerate (adj.)). Figurative sense of “to fall off, decline” was in Latin. Related: Degenerated; degenerating.

    So the dictionaries are also degenerate, sweeping aside the BIOLOGICAL/RACIAL meaning of degenerate.

    Why was adultery traditionally condemned? It means more than screwing around out of wedlock! The words adultery and adulterate have a common Latin origin.

    render (something) poorer in quality by adding another substance, typically an inferior one [negroes, etc.].
    “the meat was ground fine and adulterated with potato flour”
    synonyms: make impure, degrade, debase, spoil, taint, contaminate

    Adultery means to adulterate the genes- to ruin the race!

    Amerikwa today is “impure, degraded, debased, spoiled, tainted, and contaminated.”

    The money is also adulterated [some say diluted]. Adulteration is the wej principle.

  9. MOISHE (NOT) says:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s