The latest Amy Chu’a book made me reach for my tinfoil hat. I’m not usually conspiratorial, but this looks like a partial controlled demolition of multiculturalism-egalitarianism. The oligarchy may be realizing that they cannot meet open ended obligations for dysfunctional people to breed like rabbits and become a burden on society. Next on the Yale Channel — “Is sterilizing the developmentally disabled and the criminal classes really equivalent to the Holocaust?”
Unsurprisingly, the Chinese Chua and the Jewish Rubenfeld belong to two of the eight groups they deem exceptional. In no seeming order of importance, they are:
These groups — “cultural,” mind you, never “ethnic” or “racial” or “religious” — all possess, in the authors’ estimation, three qualities that they’ve identified as guarantors of wealth and power: superiority, insecurity and impulse control.
Culture! Remember that code word? LOL. She included those hard working Nigerians to prove she’s not wacist!
Example of Nigerian impulse control.
White nationalists don’t mug for the camera much any more. WN 2.0 know better. But that’s a niche that’s going to be filled one way or another. Someone is going to notice that there are serious group differences, and want to talk about it publicly and put their faces out there.
Frankly, it’s quite a burden to argue for superiority of any kind, and represent oneself as a representative face of that superiority. Someone’s got to do it, but it’s better that someone else do it.
I’m glad someone is doing it. But I’m even more glad it’s not us!
So they are Asians and Jews and probably not purposefully or wilfully acting in the interests of ordinary whites. Nevertheless, it’s good for us when anyone makes the case for human biodiversity and against egalitarianism.
In a nutshell, the Chu’a-Rubenfelds are creating a better intellectual and ideological environment for us and our agenda to influence our fellow YT’s. They are making it safer to talk about this stuff, and to promote eugenics and exert more influence over whom our children marry. And they may very well be taking down welfare liberalism as we know it.
Amy Chu’a has come up with what she calls the Triple Package.
3. Impulse control.
She missed the most important one though — Taqqiyah. If the superior people publicize what they do, others might take it up and start competing with them for their niches. In fact, Amy Chu’a did just that with her Tiger Mom book. I’ve been a lone voice crying in the wilderness for whites to put more effort in math and science so the Asians don’t take all the math/science/engineering niches.
Tiger Mom spilled the beans. In intelligence jargon, she “gave away the store.” It’s not the Triple Package, Amy, it’s the Quadruple Package — superiority, insecurity, impulse control and a big cup of shut the fuck up! But I thank you for the store!
The Market Dominant Minorities and liberals are blissfully unaware of the circling wolfpack that is paying careful attention to them and their advantages, and not just Sino-Semites, but also Arabs, Indians and Sikhs. All these people have traits that we can adopt to our own advantage.
The irony of multiculturalism is that it’s going to ultimately fuel the rise of a new hostile elite — namely, us. We are going to draw on the accumulated folk knowledge of all the cultures that have power in this country. Multiculturalism is a breeding ground for human super germs, for Jewicillin-Resistant Aryan Homo Sapiens.
My experience with liberals is that their view of white people is about 50 years out of date. They imagine people like from the 1960’s, prosperous, naive, and easily browbeaten. That’s their story of us, and they’re holding on to it for dear life. To let go of this story would mean the end of liberalism — they will have to either let us be what we are, or kill us. That choice is going to be forced on them well before 2020. The cracks in the Berlin Wall of multiculturalism and egalitarianism. are forming all over the place — Amy Chu’a, being a Yalie, is a most prominent crack in the wall.
One thing that baffles me — is she so naive about political correctness that she didn’t realize that there will be a hate storm against her? Or, to engage in conspiratorial thinking, is Amy Chu’a about more than just a woman writing books? Is she a tool of larger forces? Being at Yale, one has to suspect this.
Is Amy Chu’a part of the controlled demolition of multiculturalism-egalitarianism? And second, is this controlled-demoition going to empower us? I’m not sure about the first, but I answer a strong yes to the second.