Obama Sues to Allow Illinois muslims to Skip Work Without Being Fired

Muslims make themselves difficult for employers, with Obama’s help. This is a very good thing.

~~Defender of Faith~Guardian of Truth~~

sharia in america Capture

By Warner Todd Huston

So, according to the Obama administration, if you are a Muslim in Illinois who signed a contract to work for a company, but you find that you just don’t want to do something your boss tells you to do, why, you just don’t have to do it. Oh, and if you are fired for refusing to do the work you contracted to do, why, Obama will sue your employer for you.

STAR TRANSPORT TRUCKING STAR TRANSPORT TRUCKING

This is what has happened in the Land Of Lincoln with the US Government vs the Star Transport trucking company. A couple of Muslims signed a contract to work for a trucking company, a contract that says that drivers will take any load that a company administrator assigns and will deliver that payload. Period. The terms of employment are known ahead of time among all employees.

But a couple of Muslims…

View original post 348 more words

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Obama Sues to Allow Illinois muslims to Skip Work Without Being Fired

  1. So Muslims are allowed to refuse to transport alcohol because of their religion. But Christians aren’t allowed to refuse to work on a “gay wedding” as happened to the photographers last year.

    It might be tempting to say that the state is favoring Islam over Christianity, but what this is really about is white vs. non-white. Since Islam is a religion of non-whites, it gets catered to. Since most white Americans are Christians to one degree or another, their religious scruples don’t matter.

    • mindweapon says:

      Excellent point, Hipster!

    • tteclod says:

      If a Mohamadian cultist refuses to photograph a gay wedding, is that lawful?

      • Jon says:

        As most homos give a wide berth to Muslims from fearing violent reactions and because of acute awareness of PC trumps, some independently wealthy florist or baker in West Hollywood or Castro in SF would need to insincerely convert to Islam and then refuse service to a poof couple, thus setting a precedent such that could maybe be used in the instant case.

      • Jon says:

        If there were someone willing to go through all that, it creates a damned if they do/damned if they don’t situation for the government. And if they go for a third option and explicitly and especially favour Islam over Christianity in the law, it’s a PR disaster that would make for some very good propaganda.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s