‘Limbaugh hack your Twitter account?’ Bill Maher causes a stir with his take on Donald Sterling

Bill Maher defends Donald Tokowski (Clippers owner). Black Twitter erupts in anti-White hate! The Left eating it’s own some more! Go Blacks — beat up on the White liberals! I love it!

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

46 Responses to ‘Limbaugh hack your Twitter account?’ Bill Maher causes a stir with his take on Donald Sterling

  1. A.Ralston says:

    Sterling is Jewish. Maher is Jewish via his mother. Of course Maher gives Sterling a pass. Racial loyalty trumps politics and ideology. For most Whites, tribal loyalty trumps nothing.

    • Hauer says:

      Exactly. This is business as usual. I’d be much more surprised if Maher didn’t defend Sterling.
      Frankly, I’m surprised the accusations against Sterling have escalated this far. He must be out of his league and angered the wrong people. I imagine most billionaires have extensive damage control plans to prevent this from even getting this far.

    • mindweapon says:

      Good catch! I hadn’t thought of that angle, silly me.

  2. TabuLa Raza says:

    “. . .eating it’s own. . .” It’s is a contraction of “it is”- its is the possessive- “eating its own”
    “Sometimes it’s it’s. . .Sometimes it’s its. . .Sometimes it’s it’z. . .Sometimes it’s itz. . .itz

  3. thordaddy says:

    Before this is done being spun, “white supremacy” with be the nasty culprit and many, many more “white” liberals will be polar bared naked.

  4. thordaddy says:

    And let’s not forget who stands at the center of this “controversy?”

    He who became the face of the “Biggest Lie” of the Gen X generation… The front “man” pushing one of the most psychologically damaging memes of all time.

    “Magic” “Johnson” himself…

    This stuff is like one big movie now…

    • questioningfellow says:

      Fuck that profiteering faggot (No offense to queers) Earvin “Magic” Johnson. HIV?AIDS is a colossal fuck-up, akin to Japanese SMON, Pellagra, blooding with leeches, smallpox as an airbourne/touch transmittable disease instead of the bedbug vector it actually is; because we have the internets, we have a much better understanding of how disease actually works if we only research it. HIV tests are based on that evil scum Robert Gallo who was only able to test 37% positivity out of his sample of AIDS patients.

      http://barnesworld.blogs.com/barnes_world/2006/08/more_on_african.html

      “Some of the usual knuckleheads at another site have posted a little piece on our favorite epidemiologist, the ditzy Dr. Nancy Padian:

      One of the more egregious myths perpetrated by AIDS denialists is that HIV is not heterosexually transmitted. Part of the “evidence” that underlies this myth is a 1997 paper by Dr. Nancy Padian and her colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco (Padian NS, Shiboski SC, Glass SO, Vittinghoff E. 1997. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Northern California: results from a ten-year study. Am J Epidemiol 146, 350-357) (1). The denialists either misinterpret or misunderstand this paper. Some internet sites/Blogs even go so far as to suggest that the “HIV/AIDS establishment” (sic) finds Dr. Padian’s work inconvenient and has suppressed it, to the detriment of her professional career. The following commentary from Dr. Padian addresses HIV heterosexual transmission, discusses what her seminal 1997 paper does actually say and, ipso facto, speaks to the absurdity of the notion that her work has been suppressed, or is inconvenient to other AIDS researchers.

      Isn’t it funny how these stooges cannot even address the salient facts of the Padian paper? In fact, few of ’em ever even heard of the paper, until, ahem, yours truly started beating ’em over the head with it at Tara Smith’s blog.

      Then, these jokers trot out ditzy Nancy to pontificate a bit:

      HIV is unquestionably transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. Indeed, heterosexual intercourse is now responsible for 70-80% of all HIV transmissions worldwide

      Hmm. That’s quite a bold statement, Nancy. Have epidemiological studies in the USA backed this up?

      A common practice is to quote out of context a sentence from the Abstract of the 1997 paper: “Infectivity for HIV through heterosexual transmission is low”.

      Well, that’s because infectivity for HIV is low. You estimated 1/1000 sex acts for a woman to get it from an infected man, and 1/10,000 for a man to get it from an infected woman. But,here is my absolutely favorite part:

      “That we witnessed no HIV transmissions after the intervention documents the success of the interventions in preventing the sexual transmission of HIV”

      So, lemme get this straight. You observed hundreds of discordant HIV+ couples for 6 years, having kinky sex of all types — and NOT ONE, SINGLE, SOLITARY PERSON CONTRACTED THE VIRUS?!!?

      Ok, that sure is an “inconvenient truth” as Al Gore might say. But, that doesn’t deter the AIDS zealots — they PREVENTED infection with all their wonderful interventions, where condoms had a whopping, majestic, infallible success rate of 100%!!! Er, no: Ditzy Nancy forgot an important paragraph in her own paper:

      “Nevertheless, the absence of seroincident infection over the course of the study cannot be entirely attributed to significant behavior change. No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up” (Padian, pg 356.)

      Ooops!!!

      Here’s the bottom line on the Padian Paper:

      1. It was the largest and longest epidemiological study of heterosexual transmission of HIV in America. (Padian, pg 354.)

      2. Not a single person in the prospective study contracted HIV, despite lots of sex with HIV+ individuals. (Padian, pg 354.)

      3. A significant portion did not wear condoms consistently, including 47 couples whom Nancy described has having “unsafe sex.” I repeat:

      Nevertheless, the absence of seroincident infection over the course of the study cannot be entirely attributed to significant behavior change. No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up” (Padian, pg 356.)

      I’m sorry, Nancy, since nobody got HIV, what was so “unsafe” about the sex again?

      In sum, the scientific facts of this large study decimate the purported link between HIV transmission and sex. More so, even if trivial amounts of HIV can be infrequently transmitted sexually, it surely doesn’t account for the “epidemic” of 1 million people in the US who have HIV per the CDC.”

  5. clytemnestra57 says:

    There is a delicious irony to all this in a plan that has worked too well. The Jewish media worked overtime pushing Negritude on the country, marketing Negro Numinosity for all its worth. Making the Black President an object of reverence and adoration. Using African slavery and Jim Crow to whip up the White guilt and make Whites less competitive to themselves.

    Why do I feel like I am watching an updated version of that story, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice? Pushing Civil Rights was powerful magic for the Jews and with The Sterling Flap, it looks like it somehow got away from them and overwhelmed them.

    The Donald Sterling Tempest in a Teapot signals that a seismic power shift has taken place in “Murrica.” I grew up reading Anne Frank under much less liberal attitudes towards Blacks and I would have thought nothing could trump The Holocaust Card. Need I remind folks here that, at 81 years of age, Sterling is a Holocaust-era Jew? I’m shocked shitless that NO one in the Jewish community has come out fighting brandishing that Holocaust Card.

    Sterling is rich, powerful billionaire Holocaust-era Jew. That should have counted for a lot. But it seems to be counting for nothing. The Jews have thrown him under the bus, the media is piling on, and Sterling is huddled in the fetal position. When does the apology tour replete with groveling start?

    • clytemnestra57 says:

      An acquaintance of mine has a theory about what is going on behind the Sterling Flap.

      He thinks that a conspiracy is behind forcing Sterling to sell his team at fire sale prices. Sterling is very unpopular in the NBA, because he is a cheap owner who cuts corners. There is a big call by the NBA and the sports media for Sterling to “relinquish” his team. Interestingly enough, there is a buyer all lined up, who has been interested in acquiring Sterling’s team for some time; Magic Johnson.

      Sterling’s half-Black, half-Mexican girlfriend set him up by making him jealous of all the young Black studs she was hanging out with and making sure it got back to him. Then she taped him sounding racist when jealousy, not racism motivated him.

      It looks to me like the Blacks took a page out of the Jewish playbook of using honeypots to incriminate and take down powerful men.

      Ironically, ethnic networking and tribal warfare are succeeding in taking down a top gun.

    • thordaddy says:

      You cannot overlook the fact that amongst the radical “black” collective, Don Sterling = “white supremacy.” And ultimately, the predicted ouster of Sterling will be seen by the “intellectual” class as a triumph over “white supremacy.”

      Watch.it.happen.

  6. Pingback: You pious Dems "non-racists";Racist Clippers Owner Donald Sterling Is a Democrat! - Page 12 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

  7. thordaddy says:

    “If I have to listen to one more ‘alpha’ nigel tell me how shocked and outraged he is that ONE Jew in America does not believe in equality, I’m gonna puke!”

  8. thordaddy says:

    This is a theatrical shakedown.

    The game of degenerates.

    Things must collapse… Let’s send the NBA back to Naismith.

  9. thordaddy says:

    The WN should be thinking “domino effect.”

    The supposed takeaway from all this “cintroversy” is that the nigel should get to cozy up next to your lady if he so desires. Old Sterling couldn’t quite put into words what that little toy already knew subconsciously. But the meta-narrative is the “righteousness” of miscegenation and the liberation from “white supremacy.”

  10. thordaddy says:

    If there were some real ballers in the NBA they would be demanding an instant shutdown of the dyke league and an automatic pay increase across the board.

  11. thordaddy says:

    Now is the time to ask Maher whether “racism” should be made illegal.

  12. thordaddy says:

    Things have to collapse…

    The nigel has shown us his “expertise.”

    Facilitation is word.

  13. thordaddy says:

    Let’s boycott the Clippers…

    Let’s boycott all teams that don’t instantly sell to a new “black” ownership starting with the Dallas Mavericks.

    • mindweapon says:

      Boycott? I don’t watch sports at all. I spent “SuperBowl Sunday” in a coffee shop tutoring my daughter in calculus.

      • thordaddy says:

        Yeah… I don’t watch the NBA either… Or any sports for that matter. But, the boycott is for those too stupid to understand what they may ultimately topple.

  14. thordaddy says:

    I think that’s what it is going to take…

    You need a total ownership turnover across the NBA…

    This is the only guarantee one could have that the kind of “racism” exhibited by Sterling was not to be repeated.

    And then to make sure no “racism” ever runs through the veins of NBA ownership, a brand new, fresh “black” ownership would need to be installed.

    Calamity… Exacerbate the calamity.

  15. thordaddy says:

    If you’re a “black” intellect then Sterling sets off your ingrained suspicion of the Jew and you think conspiracy as a matter of course. Certain players elicit default assumptions. So how does Sterling spin it. That’s easy. Disappears. Fades out. And slowly let’s the lower nigel take the shakedown where it always goes. Maybe the NBA makes him sell the team. “Black” ownership picks it up on the cheap. AND “white supremacy” is put in its place…

    This story is getting played out.

    It can’t work much longer…

    The gig is up…

    Collapse of the NBA is imminent. Its ownership is riddled with “racist” rumors.

    Pass it on…

    • mindweapon says:

      The NBA wouldn’t collapse because of “racist” rumors, but because it’s not making enough money. So far looks like they are, but give us 200 a barrel oil and we’ll see.

    • Wally says:

      “Collapse of the NBA is imminent”

      I don’t see any evidence that the NBA is about to collapse. Especially with the money from the TV contracts.

      • thordaddy says:

        Wishful thinking is how these things will collapse… Or “black” ownership across the board. Every speck of “racism” shall be purged.

      • mindweapon says:

        thordaddy,

        when oil is 200 a barrel, pro sports is over. I can’t friggin’ wait, brother!

  16. thordaddy says:

    “Free my brothas… Give the NBA to the black magne!!!”

  17. Peter Blood says:

    Well, here’s who runs the NBA (basically, the league office, which is in Jew York City):

    http://www.nba.com/careers/management_team.html

    Here’s a list of NBA Owners:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NBA_team_owners

    Both lists are Jew-heavy, just looking at names.

    Maybe Sterling just wasn’t making enough money for the tribe and needs to be replaced? Magic Johnson wouldn’t really be a big-time owner; he’s involved in a minor percentage with the Dodgers, he’s mainly there as “the face of the ownership group” since LA loves him. He would probably play the same role with the Clippers. Need to look at who owns the lion’s share of the Dodgers.

    BING! The LA Dodgers are owned by the…wait for it…Guggenheim Partners!

  18. Jon says:

    Make Mr. “Sterling” (né Whateverowitz) an old money WASP and Maher calls for blood just like the rest of the chorus.

  19. Bad Mr. Frosty says:

    First Colbert, now Maher. The melanin-deficient liberals have lost control of their pets.

    Frankenstein’s (-stein, how appropriate) monster has turned on his creator.

    Burn Baby Burn!

    • mindweapon says:

      Hehehehe, yeah!

      I wonder if it’s because their Paychex are depleting? I tell you, the day there’s no more Paychex for Anti-White Ideological Enforcement and Forced Race-Mixing Enforcement, we will be free!

      I know it seems like an impossible future, but in our life time we will be able to be openly WN. Other things may be very very bad — like starvation, disorder, and so on. But political correctness will be gone.

  20. Contaminated NEET says:

    80 years old and richer than Croesus… What does this guy have to lose? If he apologizes at all, it’ll be proof positive his guts have been scooped out and replaced with sawdust. We’ve all heard the expression, “fuck you money,” well Tokowitz has that, plus a spot at the top of the Reaper’s schedule. They’re going to take away his stable of gladiators and pay him a few hundred million in compensation, what a terrible fate. I wouldn’t grovel and beg to avoid that if I were in his shoes. Plus, we all know that no amount of self-abasement is going to preserve his ownership of the team now, anyway.

  21. hardscrabble farmer says:

    Sterling (I guess Silver was already taken) has played his “I’m not a racist” defense.
    Reminds me of the old punch line-

    “We’ve already established what you are, now we’re just haggling over the price.”

  22. Marco says:

    Hilarious what a bunch of ingrates blacks are. Kikes make them saints in USA and they still can’t tell the difference between them and Whites!

    • mindweapon says:

      Marco,

      Point well taken. See the movie “People I Know” with Al Pacino that depicts the conflict between Jews and Blacks.

      I prefer more genteel language on this blog and I would ask you to respect that when you comment here. We are way beyond the anger stage here, and I’d like to bring you beyond the anger stage where you feel the need to use coarse, WN 1.0 type language. As I always say, for me it is a Technical Problem and a Game, and I hope to persuade my readers to view it that way.

      Using slurs is expressing anger; anger means you are crying for justice or screaming for vengeance. Neither are useful at our level.

      See the Terminators at the top of this blog? Those are the Mindweapons. No emotion. Just the mission. The mission is a Technical Problem and a Game.

  23. wobbly says:

    So either

    1) Jews taught blacks how to shale down white people over race and now blacks are doing it to Jews.

    or

    2) The Jews don’t have any more WASPs to target so they’re turning their evolved ultra-aggression on themselves.

    popcorn time either way.

  24. We are adult White people, not little children to be used and abused by Jewish Masters and their Shabbos goy sycophants. Nushawn Williams “infected” all those girls, yet Tommy Morrison and Arther Ashe and Christiane Maggiore NEVER infected their spouses? Christiane Maggiore’s daughter died of amoxillin poisoning, yet, it took the L.A. coroners three months to pronounce her dead of AIDS and only after a reporter told them of Maggiore’s “positive” status. (She had tested, positive, negative, indeterminate, positive, negative, et cetera.) A Jewess by the Name of Jeanne Bergmann accused her of being an HIV negative falsely tested positive fucking with the hopes of HIV positives. Maggiore and her daughter both were healthy and died rapidly, literally within a month.

    http://helpforhiv.com/

    “Being diagnosed HIV-Positive can be a traumatic experience – emotionally, mentally, and physically.

    Following the initial shock, most people are faced with a lot of fears and questions about a number of life-changing issues.

    We created this website to help you find your way through these fears by helping you better understand the medical facts about your diagnosis, and to provide information that can help guide you in making some important decisions.

    (Please note that, except for many of the books, everything on this website is offered FREE to all visitors.)

    Here are ten facts every person diagnosed as HIV-positive has a right to know (click on the words in green for quick references)…

    FACT #1: There is strong evidence that the HIV test you took is very often wrong. We have found over fifty different scientific studies listing seventy non-HIV conditions that can make the test produce false positive results. Depending on which test you took, they have been proven to be wrong as much as 90% of the time. So you might not be HIV-positive at all.

    FACT #2: The HIV test you took was not a test for AIDS, or even a test for HIV. Despite what we’ve all been told, it was a simple test to find certain antibodies in your blood — an “HIV-antibody” test. But viral antibodies alone do not indicate a current infection. In fact, in virtually every other antibody test, to be positive for the antibodies means that you had exposure to or a prior virus infection and are now immune from the disease that virus could cause. Antibody protection is the basis for the practice of vaccinations, like gaining immunity against the flu with a flu shot. There are no studies that show why we should think any differently about antibodies to HIV. A growing number of experts now believe that testing HIV-antibody-positive actually means that you have successfully created what your body needs to defeat any HIV infection, not to make you sick!

    FACT #3: No HIV test, whether it uses blood, urine or saliva, has ever been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the specific intended purpose of diagnosing infection with HIV.

    FACT #4: The HIV test you took has never been “validated,” as was normally done in the past. That means that there has never been a group of people who tested HIV-positive who were then proven to have active HIV (not just the antibodies) in their blood. Conversely, there has also never been a group who tested HIV-negative and were proven not to have active HIV in their blood. This lack of test validation raises serious questions about the validity of your positive diagnosis.

    FACT #5: The proteins used in the HIV test kits have never been proven to be unique or specific for HIV. In fact, every one of the proteins used in the test has been found to be associated with conditions that have nothing to do with HIV — and many of these proteins have nothing to do with illness of any kind. In other words, scientific evidence cannot prove that a positive HIV test means that you have HIV or AIDS or any other health problem, and it says so right on every test package. Most doctors giving the test and most people taking the test never see this disclaimer.

    FACT #6: Nineteen samples of the same blood were sent to nineteen different laboratories for a Western Blot test, and they all came back with different results. 525 samples of the same blood of an ELISA-Positive test were sent to 525 different laboratories for a Western Blot confirmation, and came back with very different results. One blood sample was sent to the same lab 44 times and came back with different results. This means that your test results could have been different if they had been done in a different laboratory.

    FACT #7: There is no established standard for determining the results of your test. In fact, there are at least ten different ways to interpret your HIV test, and each one of those can give a different result. It often depends on where you live in the world, whose standards are used to interpret your test, and what information you give about your life and health history. You might be positive according to one set of standards, but negative using another. Some people have gone from being HIV-positive to being HIV-negative just by moving to a different location, or by changing laboratories or testing sites, or giving different information about their potential “risk factors.”

    FACT #8: Many people believe that HIV viral load tests do what antibody tests cannot, by detecting the actual virus. But this is a false belief. According to the disclaimer statements on viral load tests, they are “not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or to confirm HIV infection.” This is because the viral load tests have some of the same problems as the HIV blood tests: they have never been validated, the “probes” and “primers” they use have never been proven to be unique or specific to HIV, they are not standardized from laboratory to laboratory, they produce a high rate of false positives, and more. In fact, most laboratories will not allow you to take an HIV viral load test unless you have already tested HIV-positive, because people who are HIV-negative have had high HIV viral load results. In addition, the most recent scientific study shows that viral load measurements failed in 90% of the cases in predicting the loss of CD4 cells, which HIV is supposed to destroy. In fact, viral load tests were only able to predict “progression to disease” in 4% to 6% of the HIV-Positives studied. This study proves that there must be “nonvirological mechanisms as the predominant cause of CD4 cell loss.” In other words, HIV cannot be the cause of immune deficiency and therefore a viral load test is a totally useless indicator of whether someone will get AIDS. An analysis of this study in the same issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that viral load results alone should not be used to begin antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

    FACT #9: A lot of emphasis is also placed on CD4 (or T-cell) counts to diagnose someone with AIDS. However, T-cell counts can fluctuate widely from day to day and hour to hour even in normal healthy people. We’ve known since 1991 that “variance in CD4 from …non-HIV related longitudinal fluctuations needs to be accounted for in analysis of the prognostic power of CD4 in HIV infection.” (reference deleted from the Internet by the National Institutes of Health) And other studies have found perfectly healthy HIV-negative individuals with very low T-cell counts. And as recently as May 2007, from the Imperial College of London: “Our new interdisciplinary research has thrown serious doubt on one popular theory of how HIV affects these [CD4] cells.”

    FACT #10: Despite what you hear from the mass media, there is no scientific study that proves that HIV is transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. In fact, the opposite is true. The longest and largest study of its kind (called the Padian study) found no transmission of HIV in any of the study couples, regardless of whether they were using condoms or not; and the most recent study from the British Medical Journal found no evidence that abstinence education would prevent HIV infection.

    BUT THAT’S NOT ALL !

    Even if the HIV tests were validated, approved for diagnosing actual HIV infection, and had a universal standard of interpretation, there is still no conclusive medical evidence that proves that testing positive is an indication that you are or will become sick. Despite everything you may have heard over the past twenty years, there is still no scientific study that proves that HIV causes AIDS or shows that it destroys the immune system. In fact, a review of the medical literature reveals that HIV fails every medical and scientific test to be called the cause of AIDS.

    Because of these questions about the HIV tests, and HIV itself, you should carefully consider whether or not to take the drugs you will be pressured to take, called anti-retroviral drugs (or HAART). Recent scientific studies show that more people are dying from the side effects of these drugs than from illnesses associated with AIDS, and that the drugs being given today are even worse than the ones offered ten years ago. These statements, and all the other information offered on this website, are not our opinions, but irrefutable facts. If you are told something different by your doctor or the mass media, we urge you to read the scientific studies for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

    Although this information is rarely found in the mass media or in presentations by the AIDS establishment, it is supported by more than 2800 medical and scientific researchers, legal experts, doctors, chiropractors, PhD’s, journalists, health care providers, and other professionals – including two Nobel Prize winners in medicine and chemistry and members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

    FROM AN EMAIL RECEIVED JULY 14, 2007…

    Just an update that confirms everything on your website. I had FOUR rapid tests done within a week, two were negative and two were positive. I had TWO Western Blots done. One showed I was reactive on every band but one (HIV+) and the other showed I was reactive on only one band (HIV-indeterminate). For tests that are supposed to be over 99% accurate they just proved they only have a 50% accuracy. In fact, I took two rapids at the exact same time and one was negative and one was positive. What a scam. ~ Kim”

    Yes, that is a long wall of text, but it should get the point across how a $30 billion dollar annum industry is so rigorously protected. No, that is not a typo, $30 billion per annum from the Fed .Gov since 1985, plus all the fundraising and other foreign .govs.

    http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2011/06/one-point-for-being-close.html

    Note that it says about “Fruits and Vegetables: droppings of sick animals find their way into water bodies that in turn feed the soil.”
    However, sprouts are farmed without soil and without fertilizer.
    Bean sprouts are grown from seeds in steam drums at a temperature of 38C.
    As the agriculture minister for Lower Saxony, Gert Lindemann, puts it, this is “ideal” breeding ground for all bacteria.However, it is uncertain how the O104 strain of E. coli could get there in the first place. The bacterium normally lives in the gut of animals and E. coli outbreaks can start when faeces are used as fertiliser or when they contaminate water.
    However, Klaus Verbeck, managing director of the farm in Germany, is reported as saying: “The salad sprouts are grown only from seeds and water, and they aren’t fertilised at all. There aren’t any animal fertilisers used in other areas on the farm either.”

    http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2012/05/dirt-cheap-operation.html

    ‘Back before the internet and blogs, before people knew about that six percent of the population, but not so far back that you can’t remember….. the social engineers probably had a lot of fun. They could conduct experiments with complete impunity. People were not cynical like they are today, and they didn’t have access to any information except what they could purchase at the newsstand or watch on teevee…. a naive, captive audience, respectful of authority….

    One of the victims, Mary Reiner, got her capsules from a hospital where she had just given birth. Those capsules were “unit-packaged,” ie: she got a blister pack or something similar with eight pills. She did not purchase a bottle from a store like the other victims, a critically important detail. The tainted capsules were thus in a hospital supply chain, and not just in retail stores, which changes everything. The killer would have to be a little more sophisticated than the “profile” suggests.
    Q: You point out a number of inconsistencies and, in your estimation, absurdities that have been perpetuated since the 1982 and 1986 poisonings.
    A: Number one would be the madman-in-the-retail stores hypothesis. My findings debunk this hypothesis, and point instead to a repackaging facility in the channel of distribution as the location where the tamperings occurred.”

    A.Peasant at Twelfth Bough is probably one of the best amateur investigators out there. She is the shit. She doesn’t shy away from the Jewish Question either. You could learn a shitload from her. I throw her in the mix to demonstrate just how fuckin’ EVIL the forces we are against really are.

  25. questioningfellow says:

    Hmmm, I am censured. okay, simple links and comments then.

    We are adult White people, not little children to be used and abused by Jewish Masters and their Shabbos goy sycophants. Nushawn Williams “infected” all those girls, yet Tommy Morrison and Arther Ashe and Christiane Maggiore NEVER infected their spouses? Christiane Maggiore’s daughter died of amoxillin poisoning, yet, it took the L.A. coroners three months to pronounce her dead of AIDS and only after a reporter told them of Maggiore’s “positive” status. (She had tested, positive, negative, indeterminate, positive, negative, et cetera.) A Jewess by the Name of Jeanne Bergmann accused her of being an HIV negative falsely tested positive fucking with the hopes of HIV positives. Maggiore and her daughter both were healthy and died rapidly, literally within a month.

    http://helpforhiv.com/

    this should get the point across how a $30 billion dollar annum industry is so rigorously protected. No, that is not a typo, $30 billion per annum from the Fed .Gov since 1985, plus all the fundraising and other foreign .govs.

    I throw A.Peasant at Twelfth Bough in this post. She is probably one of the best amateur investigators out there. She is the $hit. She doesn’t shy away from the Jewish Question either. You could learn a lot from her in her ability to “Unpack” the BS. I throw her in the mix to demonstrate just how fuckin’ EVIL the forces we are against really are. two VERY pertinent posts are….

    http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2012/05/dirt-cheap-operation.html

    http://twelfthbough.blogspot.com/2011/06/one-point-for-being-close.html

    • Oh believe me we know how evil they are. Always good to have new information though. Thanks for posting.

      • questioningfellow says:

        De nada Maureen, thank you and thank you again MW for allowing me to post. HIV?AIDS was my first trip down the rabbit hole and out of the warren into the light.

        I read up on HIV testing of Japanese across the class spectrum back in 1990s, 1 out of every 4 tested positive how is that possible?. I read up on whores from Tijuana to Africa to India, the prostitutes who kept themselves hygienic, ate good food and avoided alcohol and drugs had lower rates of STDs and HIV positivity not just compared to the druggie whores, but to the population as a WHOLE. I know this all seems off-topic, but it really doesn’t take much, a few links and hours of study and another YKW and their Shabbos Goy money-maker is tossed on th Crystal Methodist DWL and Conservative (Inc) woodpile. Remember that crazy Oprah show where she and all the “experts” said one out of every 5 Americans would be dead or dying of HIV by 1995?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s