Courageous woman questions mandatory Holocaust education in public schools, calls it a religious dogma that violates separation of Church (Synagogue) and State

Denise over at White Tea Room found this one.

The lady is very courageous. Interestingly, two panelists, Philip Weiss and Jeffrey Blankfort, say that the schools should teach White guilt in all its myriad forms, including slavery guilt and Indian guilt. Blankfort bashes the Anne Frank and Elie Wiesel books.

A great example of the Family Argument upon which we can eavesdrop!


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to Courageous woman questions mandatory Holocaust education in public schools, calls it a religious dogma that violates separation of Church (Synagogue) and State

  1. Cj aka Elderofzyklons Blog says:

    Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.

  2. gibbon says:

    So it’s the entire west that’s at fault now for Jewish expulsion in Germany? Even the majority of the countries that went to war against the Germans, losing untold millions? And now amazingly the west is also guilty for the suffering that the Israelis inflict on the Palestinians?!!!! Are Jews ever guilty of anything? Are Non-Jewish whites ever NOT guilty of anything? Then that smug A-hole at the end BOASTS of censoring the sincere questions of that woman: “…and no one heard your last remark (laughs).”

    I don’t think these guys can maintain this for much longer. This attack in response to every question policy is wearing thin. There only response is to “get offended.” And one can see, visibly, that they are not even really offended (not that this should matter). They did not enjoy the “genuine” support of the crowd. The false opposition schtick whereby only members of their “community” can make criticism is also wearing quite thin. Hey, don’t want us to criticize you? Never again depict a non-Jewish white man or woman in a negative light in any of your writings or media and you’ve got a deal.

    • mindweapon says:

      Great points, Gibbon. I sure hope you are right that they can’t maintain it for much longer.

      • gibbon says:

        I guess it all depends by what one regards as “much longer” AND if what I am saying is actually the case. Because honestly, who knows?! Though the current state of affairs is simply astonishing and does not seem unsustainable as a result. I just have a feeling the generation coming up is not going to be feeling “Jewish Suffering” as much as we were. Once “Jewish Suffering” is gone, all the remains is the naked fact of Jewish Hegemony. And then it’s on. King of The Hill, however glorious, is always the least safe position to be in.

      • gibbon says:


    • asmoday20 says:

      Sure we’ll burn the entirely of the Western World. Axis and Allies. Your ancestors could have fought to free slaves in the Civil War but you will be asked to pay reparations soon regardless.
      Business as usual.

  3. gibbon says:


  4. Privileging Shoah proselytizing while minimizing Communist atrocities, the Palestinian Nakba, the Armenian Genocide and countless other human rights violations, is itself an example of Jewish Privilege. Jews who are principled advocates of human rights must lead by example and work for justice in the Apartheid Regime of Jew Bigotry in Zionist Occupied Palestine.

    Anything else is simply a racist attack on the diverse European peoples.

  5. Occigent says:

    I’m getting close to looking forward to the day when anyone who refers to white guilt for the Holocaust, for slavery, for the Native Americans, for anything a person did not specifically engage in, gets a fist to the face and gets loaded on a train.

    I even have “patriot” friends who disarm conversation by referring to what was done to the Native Americans.

    Collective guilt is such a hobbling phenomena, especially for whites. That’s why Christ played such an important part in our cultural development. We need to feel redeemed. I’m sick of being crushed under the weight of stuff I didn’t do.

    This culture of critique needs to go. I can think of no more just rationale for engaging an enemy than to simply free oneself from this prison of unjust guilt. I don’t owe Jews, I don’t owe blacks and I don’t and I don’t owe Natives. So stop trying to collect. Damn it enrages me.

  6. earthman92 says:

    “There’s no business like Shoah business…”

  7. Fifty-five years ago, when I was in high school, two English teachers engaged in as-if-“religious” proselytism on behalf of Romanticism! Nihil novum sub soli?

  8. FN says:

    There is the BIG LIE that is taught in all schools and in all media and in the very churches that the those who supposedly worship the man killed by the YKW, is that 6,000,000 YKW were killed in homicidal gas chambers. That is the BIG LIE. BTW Germar Rudolf earned his Phd at the Max Planck Institute in Germany. He went to Auschwitz and using the knowledge he had learned at the MPI tested the walls of the “gas chambers” at Auschwitz and guess what? NO PRUSSIAN BLUE, his thanks? Being STRIPPED of his Phd by the MPI and then being arrested by flak-jacket M-16 armed Feds dragged, in handcuffs from his home in US in front of his wife and 2 little boys. The USSA baby. Read and LEARN, without the BS of the “Holohoax” the YKW would be significantly weakened.

  9. Rita Rabbit says:

    Awesome woman. I wonder who she is?

    Yes how fascinating to watch Jews decide what OUR children will learn. I definitely picked up on the false paradism of the only other options besides holohoax propaganda are other White guilt inducing narratives.

    And this business of “The West” owing something to Palestinians left me yelling at the computer. What Chutzpah!!!!

  10. eyeslevel says:

    Stop child abuse in the public schools!
    Stop psychological torture in the public schools!
    End anti-whitism in the public schools!

    • wobbly says:

      “Stop child abuse in the public schools!”

      That is exactly what it is – doubly so when the same people are covering up the millions they killed in the Soviet camps.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of the photographs used in holocaust memorials were actually from Soviet camps.

  11. pluto the dog says:

    That not young woman is brilliant – she remembers dates – everything, her logic is awesome. l hope she isnt one of them. Her point about international jeweries declaration of war against Germany is sublime. Describing holocaust education as religious dogma is just as good, you need to take a kind of a hop to get to that and it works – its not a straightforward step in logic, it is so good, Those ykw’s on the panel cant counter her points, all they can do is repeat the narrative we’ve been hearing for eons. Just keep repeating it and people will be bashed into belief. Remember if you are going to tell a lie make it a big one – no one believes little lies.

    • Sam says:

      Always remember that when Hitler said,”… the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” …” that Hitler was talking about the Jews. They have twisted this such that it seems that Hitler was saying HE believed in the practice. Lies. Lies. Lies.

  12. gibbon says:

    By calling the Holocaust Religious Dogma she was effectively positioning herself as a “Denier.” But notice how they didn’t want to go down that road? Whether deliberately or not, she set a trap yet they wisely didn’t grab the bait. Had cooler heads not prevailed and, say, a Deborah Lipstadt had attended, this could have easily gotten out of control. Woman: “It’s religious Dogma.” Lipstadt: “So you are denying the Holocaust?” In other words, Lipstadt would be responding with religious language playing right into her hands. That is, if she had the awareness to rebut by pointing out the religious nature of her rebuttal. Henceforth it should be referred to as “Religious Dogma.”

    • pluto the dog says:

      l bet she’s a veritable goldmine of clear thinking. To get from ‘religious dogma’ to ‘holocaust denial’ you will need to employ some pretty slick arguments. jews have embraced the idea of the holocaust so wholeheartedly it now has the appearance of a religious pillar, and by making it a central if not the central tenet of their pseudo ‘religion’ they have rendered themselves extremely vulnerable – If its a religious pillar then it belongs in their temple, not in state schools.

    • ben tillman says:

      Of course, it’s religious dogma. Some of us have been saying this for years:

      • ben tillman says:

        Calling it religious dogma isn’t the same as saying it isn’t true.

      • gibbon says:

        “Calling it religious dogma isn’t the same as saying it isn’t true.” It’s pretty damn close considering the reputation of religion in recent years. Certainly the term dogma is typically used in a pejorative manner in the secular west. Regardless, she places the holocaust in the category of religion instead of history .i.e. something Jews believe but not something that should be understood in the context of history (because???).

        In fact, the first reply to her remarks indicates the “denial” that is both sensed in them and, indeed, implicit in them: “I see no problem with teaching the holocausts in the schools. We should teach all of world history in the schools. This is an event which happened…” He reminds us that it IS history and that it DID happen because effectively she was indicating, at the very least, her doubts on both counts. Indeed, had she complained that religious dogma like Creationism shouldn’t be taught/promoted in schools we’d all reasonably assume she though Creationism was bullshit. So, yeah, I’d say, for all intents and purposes, she was denying, yet being cagey about it, which served her well.

        She may not have come up with the idea that it was religious dogma (we all likely agree this understanding has been with us for a long time) but she used it brilliantly in this context (in a public ambush). Only demerit in my book: she looked a little ticked off. No need to William Pierce on anyone’s ass.

  13. Snake says:

    She fought smart and seized the moral high ground instead of quibbling over body counts. In a similar vein:

  14. Marco says:

    If the Offician Narrative is true, why do so many states have a ban on open historical research?

    • Anon says:

      Because no one really cares, which has been the greatest strength of the narrative, but can, in an instant, become its greatest weakness.

  15. Attila says:

    The lady in question must be retired- otherwise- her job would be gone by the next day.

  16. vikingbitch says:

    Reblogged this on vikingbitch's Blog and commented:
    The ONLY way Working Whites will survive will be to completely disengage from this Jew polluted system. These ‘people’ have completely overstayed their welcome and have no sense of boundaries. Any inch you these Zios they will turn into a mile. They are what they are: manipulative, personality disordered beings.
    I am homeschooling my kids and I have made a point of spreading the word to other would-be homeschoolers about the resources that are available out there for them online and elsewhere. The more converts to homeschooling I get, the less influence ZOG will have.
    You cannot hand your children’s minds over to these people.

    • torgrim says:

      “They are what they are: manipulative, personality disordered beings.”
      Working Whites should heed this advice and disengage from “Their” system.

      “You cannot hand your children’s minds over to these people.”
      Our children must be protected.

      The ‘System’ has most of the wealth, now It wants to keep it and the road to that is through the minds of this generation and the next.

      • mindweapon says:


        The System is like a hummingbird that starves to death if it doesn’t eat nearly twice it’s body weight every day. Or like a shark that must constantly swim or drown. So I don’t think they are going to be able to keep up the propaganda to the masses. They will have to propagandize key areas, but they will let Middle America cut loose, and boy will we ever cut loose from them! And they know that, and fear it. So they are hurting us as much as possible now.

  17. ben tillman says:

    Here’s a quote from Rabbi Jacob Neusner, who’s written or edited over 950 books on Judaism:

    The Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption

    The “Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption” focuses on Germany’s destruction of most European Jews (1933-1945) and on the creation of the State of Israel (1948). It transforms these events from secular, this-worldly occurences to generative symbols of mythic proportions. This particular Judaism is communal, stressing public policy and practical action….

    ….Whereas the Judaism of the dual Torah proves compelling only on specific occasions (rites of passage such as puberty, marriage, and death), the Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption enjoys a perpetual and nearly universal response. That is, for a great many Jews, this recent Judaism asks an urgent question and answers it with a self-evident and compelling response…. Jews in North America respond to the Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption by imagining that they are someone else, living somewhere else, at another time and in another circumstance. That somewhere else is Poland in 1944, or the earthly Jerusalem of the State of Israel. Evidently, people define their everyday reality in terms of “Holocaust” and “redemption”. So for this Judaism, the Holocaust defines the question, the State of Israel the answer, to the Jewish condition….

    Is the Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption a religion? Of course it is, because it has the power to turn “being Jewish” into a mode of transcendent and mythic being.

    • mindweapon says:

      Is the Judaism of Holocaust and Redemption a religion? Of course it is, because it has the power to turn “being Jewish” into a mode of transcendent and mythic being.

      Great find, Ben.

      A mode of transcendent and mythic being sounds an awful lot like the principal character flaw, according to the Greeks – hubris Isn’t it interesting that Greeks considered hubris a flaw, where Jews call it chutzpah and encourage it among themselves?

      • VRW says:

        I don’t think it is hubris exactly. It would be good for all of us if we had a mode of transcendent and mythic being. White people are very much missing a mythology of themselves at this point, and for that matter any sense of the transcendent whatsoever, this is why atheism is really bad for people. If only there was a single event that people could rally around, that was so epic, it was nor merely historical, but mythical, that would be nothing but good. It keeps a people on the same page generation after generation.

    • torgrim says:

      “into a mode of transcendent and mythic being”….VRW said, “White people are very much missing a mythology of themselves at this point”.

      Yes, and not an accident either….”To destroy a people you must first sever their roots”.
      Aleksandr Solzhenitzn. The aggressive “Sword Evangelization” of Europe” was all about destroying the mythic being. This is what I refer to as the Dark Ages of Europe. However, not all was destroyed.

  18. mmartel says:

    Reblogged this on Weltanschauung and commented:
    speaks for itself…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s