Denmark Saves $10 Billion by Restricting Third World Immigration

Denmark reports positive results from restricting immigration; neighboring countries are going to want the same thing. Denmark can be the first domino.

a12iggymom's Blog

May 10, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield

But where will this Soldier of Allah go?

But where will this Soldier of Allah go?

Denmark has a population of less than 6 million. Imagine how much the United States could save if it stopped importing welfare cases. (via Religion of Peace)

Denmark’s strict immigration laws have saved the country billions in benefits, a government report has claimed. The Integration Ministry report has now led to calls among right-wing populists to clamp down further on immigrants to increase the savings.
The extremely strict laws have dramatically reduced the flow of people into Denmark in recent years, and many government figures are delighted with the outcome. “Now that we can see that it does matter who comes into the country, I have no scruples in further restricting those who one can suspect will be a burden on Denmark,” the center-right liberal integration minister, Søren Pind, told the Jyllands Posten newspaper.

View original post 239 more words

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Denmark Saves $10 Billion by Restricting Third World Immigration

  1. Aester says:

    3rd world immigration destroy any healthy nation.

  2. Stary Wylk says:

    It is also arguable that the U.S., by letting them in, is bleeding the rest of the world of the very persons likely to make where they came from better places to live. “Why doesn’t Mexico have a good Olympic team?”

    • Anon says:

      If our olympics team was filled with Mexicans that would be the case, but it isn’t, though it does make a good joke.

      Thanks to chain migration any benefit we would have gotten from bringing the best and brightest here gets wiped out immediately, though sheer regression to mean would have eventually done the same. When we bring people into this country we’re ultimately bringing the average member of said nation here regardless of the standards set.

      • Stary Wylk says:

        This is something you can tell a liberal so they can feel guilty about keeping the third world thirdworldish. Gives them an excuse to become anti-immigration, like pointing out that latinos take jobs blacks would do.

      • mindweapon says:

        When we bring people into this country we’re ultimately bringing the average member of said nation here regardless of the standards set.

        Wow, brilliant point sir!

  3. X says:

    Denmark would save even more if it banned Third World immigration; nonetheless, small steps are better than none.

  4. Jon says:

    I don’t know if they still do, but they used to pay any nationalised immigrant 200.000 kroner to quit. The savings for graffiti cleanup on centuries-old churches alone probably more than pay for it, never mind criminal ward costs, welfare, uncountable costs of lowering the social tone and etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s