Video of Eric Holder saying that hate crimes enforcement doesn’t apply to White victims, because of “the historic nature of the kinds of conduct we are talking about”

Save this video for your archive. Eric Holder drops the veil — hate crime is to protect historic victims. T This is a classic example of punishing the sons for the (alleged) sins of the fathers.

Jeff Sessions does a great job of raking this besuited Black Panther over the coals.

All this historic nature and history of our nation crap has no place in criminal justice.

I reject historic guilt.

But this is proof — liberalism was never about fairness, it was about BLACK POWER and of course JEWISH POWER.

Advertisements

About mindweapon

A mind weapon riding along with Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.https://en.gravatar.com/profiles/edit/#
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Video of Eric Holder saying that hate crimes enforcement doesn’t apply to White victims, because of “the historic nature of the kinds of conduct we are talking about”

  1. Porter says:

    Tribal warfare. It will live until man does not.

    And denial offers no defense.

  2. JB says:

    The real point is that he is not the least bit controversial. His opponents can’t touch him, not on this, not on using the IRS to suppress his political opponents, not on Fast and Furious (which was about pushing gun control). The system is locked up, and nothing you do in a voting booth will change anything.

  3. Jon says:

    What about equal protection under the law (for victims) or equal treatment before the law (for perps)? The senators’ main objection was kind of half-hearted and weak (“it’s unfair”). The thing that stands right out to me is the justice ministers’ glaring non-sequitur illogic, something that none of the committee members (who I assume were more than half lawyers themselves), at least in the clips we were shown, would call him on.

    • ben tillman says:

      The thing that stands right out to me is the justice ministers’ glaring non-sequitur illogic….

      You mean that the statute is supposed to deal with crimes committed in the future, so it is totally irrelevant who was targeted in the past?

      • mindweapon says:

        Good way to put it. Your legal training shines through with this.

      • Jon says:

        Yes, exactly. In Sweden at least they don’t have audacity to try to make it de jure, black-letter law like in the US, but rather the prosecutor, no matter how notorious, obvious or egregious the facts are, will only file charges on behalf of the protected classes.

  4. John says:

    All this historic nature and history of our nation crap has no place in criminal justice.

    I reject historic guilt.

    Yes, all that obfuscation is maddening and meaningless. If a hate crime is committed today, and many, many more are committed by blacks (on whites) than any other group, then it should be prosecuted as a hate crime, regardless of what happened historically, last week, last month, or two centuries ago. I actually thought his interrogators did a poor job of not plainly and specifically pointing that out. Too much pussyfooting around the edges. Better than nothing, of course, and the video evidence is best of all, but they let some fat, slow pitches, go right over the plate unswung at.

    I have no idea where he was getting that 80k figure from. From his own bogus Injustice Department figures probably, and those are completely invalidated, because we know that he doesn’t even count black on white crime as “hate crime.” His figures are worse than meaningless; they tell a false story.

    This creature is an anti-white race man, through and through.

  5. TabuLa Raza says:

    If a hate crime is committed today

    Has the notion of “hate crime” been accepted as valid?

    • Porter says:

      Obviously it’s been accepted as valid by the judiciary, legislatures, and the general public.

      And so the way to combat that leftist attack vector is to make every single interracial violent crime automatically “hate.” Given who is attacking whom, I think this would accrue greatly to our benefit. And what is the left going to do, refuse to expand hate crime legislation?

  6. Steve says:

    “And what is the left going to do, refuse to expand hate crime legislation?”
    Yes; that is what the left has already done with regards to black-on-white crime. The left has intimidated the police to designate an interracial crime a hate crime only if the victim is a protected minority.

  7. thordaddy says:

    Come on MW… These nigels are out for blood. “They” are attempting to make invisible a well-established archetype by a total banishment of its historic nomenclature. And on top of that, “they” are attempting to rid from the mind of the white man that such an archetype exists as pure hatred.

    The nigel IS a walking “hate crime.”

  8. scott says:

    If race is a social construct, how do you determine which groups have been “historically” targeted? Anti-discrimination laws are social constructs, but in order for any laws against racial discrimination to be enforceable, races must be presumed to exist. Otherwise, one accused of discrimination could prove his innocence by demonstrating that he couldn’t have possibly discriminated based on race since races don’t exist; and social constructs don’t have any legal rights or standing to claim discrimination anyway. No “black person” or “white person” who might claim discrimination actually exists except as a social construct, he could argue.

    • thordaddy says:

      This is all psychological warfare. Don’t look for intellectual consistency. Don’t wish for intellectual integrity. Don’t expect “fairness” or “equality” or “tolerance” or any of the other liberal buzzwords. Go read a “black” blog. These nigels are seething with hatred and venom. “They” don’t even attempt to couch their ingrained hatred in softer language.

      These “black” radicals want Liberation without separation.

      • mindweapon says:

        Liberation without separation — good one thordaddy.

        I deleted a previous comment of yours because it contained a racial slur. Just so you know why. We have radioactive content here as it is, so we couch it in genteel language. “nigel” is OK though.

      • thordaddy says:

        MW, I respect your decision. Yet, the strategy is clear. Banish the word and the archetype disappears right along with it AND many more whites are savagely maimed and murdered by a well established archetype with no name. Interestly though, the lack of distinction NOW puts ALL “blacks” under the microscope.

      • mindweapon says:

        There’s plenty of places where racial slurs are not banished. Mindweapons In Ragnarok occupies a very particular niche — basically the Institute of Cultural Development for Whites and the Open Source Espionage Academy.

  9. VRW says:

    why, that wasn’t a hate crime, that crime was downright friendly!

  10. TabuLa Raza says:

  11. vikingbitch says:

    Reblogged this on vikingbitch's Blog and commented:
    When words such as ‘history’ and ‘guilt’ are used, emotional triangulation, manipulation, and gaslighting are being played out. White people are the REAL victims and their legitimate cries are being twisted into ‘crazy talk’ via the crazy making media et al. In short, ‘You are not being targeted White people, it is just your imagination. Black people are just acting out because you are racist.”

  12. Firepower says:

    *sigh*

    Liberalism always was AND IS
    ABOUT eradicating whites

  13. Landsknecht says:

    So what’s teh best way to save thses YouTube videos? Anyone have any suggestions as to what works best for them?

    Thanks…

  14. UFOHUNTERORGUK says:

    Reblogged this on Ufohunterorguk.com.

  15. mmartel says:

    Reblogged this on Weltanschauung and commented:
    FOR THE ARCHIVES…Hate crimes enforcement need not apply to white victims. From the mouth of the beast. See for yourself

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s