Need a graphics person to make a lineage of photographs of all the Hitlers, from Adolf I, to Vladimir the X

OK, I decided to add Idi Amin but cut off the Hitlers at X with Putin. There will of course be future office holders of the Hitler Title, but this is good for now.

A graphic like this would make a great sign to hold at an anti-neocon protest.

Graphic artists, please make something like this for us:

Adolf I, “The Great”

Idi Amin, Hitler II

Saddam Hussein Hitler III

Slobodan Milosevic Hitler the IV

Saddam Hussein Hitler the V (the only Hitler to hold the title twice!)

Barack Obama Hitler the VI (the Patriotards love photoshopping Hitler onto this president, we had to include him)

Makhmoud Ahmedinajad Hitler the VII

Moammar Gaddafi Hitler the VIII

Bashir Assad Hitler the IX

Vladimir Putin Hitler the X


About Rob

Come with me if you want to live
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Need a graphics person to make a lineage of photographs of all the Hitlers, from Adolf I, to Vladimir the X

  1. It’s like “Caeser”, in which each subsequent office holder takes the personal name of the first one as a title.

  2. Not to cast aspersions on Hitler and his Nazis, but wouldn’t it be easier to simply lump Herr Hitler as “Amalek Number (Fill in the Blank)? There have always been leaders/peoples who found themselves at odds with YKW. The first was/were Amalek/Amalekites. It was easier to simply re-christen the Leader/People by whatever name they went by as Amalek/Amalekites. To wit:

    Today, though Amalek definitely and unfortunately exists, we cannot say with certainty who, or where, all of them are. However, there is a noteworthy exception. When Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany visited Jerusalem during his journey to the Holy Land almost all the religious leaders of Jerusalem came to the city gates to greet him. Rabbi Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld (d.1932), the spiritual leader of Ashkenazic Jewry in Israel at that time, did not go. When asked about his refusal he answered that although the Kaiser himself was deserving of the honor bestowed upon him, “I have a tradition that Germany is Amalek.”

    But somehow, someway, Herr Hitler and his Nazis were allowed to steal Amalek/Amalekites’ thunder. I would be inclined to think because Hitler et al gave a flashier presentation what with the flags, the marching, Wagner, etc. However, I believe “Durr Furor” benefitted the Jewish Zionist agenda far, far more than the Germans he claimed to represent, much less the Indo-Aryans of Europe that were genocided and somehow got lost in the Hollywood Holocaust Shuffle.

    Let’s get with the pogrom …. er, program, LOL. Or at least look at successful pogroms in the past. They always follow this formula: an order of expulsion, eviction at spear point, gun point, or bayonet point and/or finally mob justice This is working just as well with the 110th expulsion from Guatemala even today. They have always been effective and not only have these countries never had to pay reparations to YKW, no other countries were dragged into paying reparations as well.

    Hitler, some how some way lost his own legendary German efficiency when it came to a simple pogrom on Jews. Not content with simply chasing them out of the country or even executing them all, he had to round them up on the German taxpayers’ dime and keep them in concentration camps and/or help deport them to Palestine. Oddly enough, he had no difficulty exterminating the Slavs in neighboring countries. But like I said, got real bumbling and inefficient when it came to YKW. And now everybody is paying for all these Holocaust Survivors that are as prolific as cockroaches and come out of the woodwork every time reparations comes up again … which it does about every year.

    No, let’s not use Hitler as a reference point. Let YKW do it. He’s their mascot, not ours.

    • Erin says:

      Cly, no disrespect here but There was no plan to exterminate Jews by Hitler and he lost his battle so there was no inefficiency. Why perpetuate these lies.

      I love this meme. It pokes fun of those that call everyone Hitler and Nazis etc

      • lupus1290 says:

        Richard Tedor’s “Hitler’s Revolution” casts a lot of light on why Hitler ‘lost’; a great book for clearing some of those Jewish mists surrounding the ‘The War of Jewish Aggression 1914-45’

  3. thordaddy says:

    Yes Cly… History has proven that no one discredited genuine white Supremacy like Hitler and the Nazis. Then again, “they” were really anti-Supremacists destined for self-annihilation. National Socialism is a glaring contradiction in terms. One cannot cultivate a race with an “economic” system that “values” capital flowing to the least worthy at the expense of the most worthy .

    • Erin says:

      Hitler was NOT A “White Suptemacist”. Seems to me you guys are stuck in YKWs frame, believing all their lies.

      I have humored you for a while Thordaddy but “White Supremacist” is a jew term and it was created to discredit us.

      What we want is self determination as a people. We prefer each other and want to be ruled by our own benign leaders because we are related…we are cousins so why wouldn’t we prefer each other. It has nothing to do with feeling “better than”. Oh it should go without saying that we don’t want to be racemixed out of existence.

      • thordaddy says:

        Erin, you’re right that Hitler was not a white Supremacist. He was in fact an anti-Supremacist. In that understanding, he mimicked the Jewish archetype. But the reality is that the genuine white Supremacist is simply a white man that believes in objective Supremacy, i.e., The Perfect God and the Perfect Man. WNs, NSs, Jews, jihadists, homosexuals/dykes, “black” radicals, “white” self-annihilators, miggers, Hindus, Buddhists, etc REJECT SUCH A “thing.” Ergo, they are all radical liberationists destined for self-annihilation.

      • thordaddy says:

        Erin… Further, is what is inherent to the embrace of white Supremacy… Separation.

      • Jon says:

        Ruling over others is essential to supremacy, particularly when the word is used in the political sense. Think about it. Air superiority means better planes/pilots. Air supremacy means controlling enemy airspace. The Supreme Court doesn’t claim to be “better” than than district courts but rather to rule over them.

    • thordaddy says:

      Jon… Only in a relativistic paradigm does your assertion seem credible. But the reality is that white man no longer knows how to live a healthy and peaceful life. This is due to his voluntary CONFINEMENT to the relativistic paradigm and his embrace of “equality,” i.e., anti-Supremacy. The model of existence for the white man is self-evidently to be found in the Perfect Man. Modern “white” man rejects such an entity and yet still works feverishly to “perfect man” through technology and amorality. He is doomed to failure and self-annihilation.

  4. KO says:

    In any community, there has to be a ruling culture. In white Christian America, we prefer self-rule through our white Christian institutions. As soon as you have enough diversity so that there are a bunch of people who don’t want to be ruled by white Christian culture, you get a new culture run by other people. Voila, no more self-rule under white Christian culture, but rule by a “foreign” oligarchy pretending to espouse a universal culture that they pretend is American Christian or rational or liberal or progressive or universal, as the occasion requires. White Americans don’t any more claim we are better than others, but we do still, at least some of us, want to rule ourselves, therefore our culture must be supreme in our communities. When we claim self-government, we are claiming the right to have our culture and traditions and understandings reign supreme in our societies, and it is that “white supremacy,” essentially meaning nothing but self-government, that liberals and globalists and progressives and oligarchs and hostile elites of every stamp want to deprive us of. No, they say, you will not be supreme in your communities, no, you may not have your own communities, you may not have self-rule, no, we will rule over you forever, with our boot in your face.

    • thordaddy says:


      And self-rule really means the experience of God-ordained free will. Our liberal adversary REJECTS God-ordained free will and thus necessarily rejects a self-rule that isn’t inherently self-annihilating. Our liberal adversaries experience “free will” only in the basest sense thereby negating any notion of self-rule that is actually sustainable. So in fact, “self-rule” is liberal-speak that really just translates into radical autonomy, i.e., acts without apparent consequence.

    • Jon says:

      But “White Supremacy” means specifically ruling over non-Whites. If a land is comprised solely or virtually solely of one racial group you can’t properly call it racially supremacist. It’s a misnamed word-bludgeon that’s used against us. I believe they would apply such a dysphemistic misnomer to us even if we were to found a colony on Mars and most White people wanted to or were planning to go there.

      • thordaddy says:


        That’s a LIBERAL definition. A definition that insists we are CONFINED to a relativistic paradigm. A definition that insists that “integration” is unstoppable and inevitable.

        In reality, the fear of the radical liberationists is quite clear. A voluntary collective of white men striving towards Supremacy is “white Supremacy” and self-evidently not just preferable, but AUTOMATICALLY superior to ANY liberal collective born of coercive and tyrannically enforced integration.

  5. mindweapon says:

    Those who violate Godwin’s Law are destined to repeat it!

  6. mindweapon says:

    Some reference to Godwin’s Law should be in the graphic.

  7. Saddam Hussein Hitler the V (the only Hitler to hold the title twice!)

    LOL I cracked up.

  8. 0jr says:

    you left out stalin Trotsky nutuyahoo all the histories greatest murderers the jews

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s